# Review of PP-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-003 | | CrossReference | [PP-001], [QC-PP-001], [QC-LANG-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 (AI as stand-in, autonomous mode) | Initial version | [dcef5e6] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [PP-001] - Checklist used: [QC-PP-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: none (stand-in S01 reads the language and knows the domain) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit | Pass | start 2026-10-28, end 2026-11-14; the Business Case constraint is no hard deadline plus the technical constraints, quoted in Assumptions. | | 2 | Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner | Pass | five gateways, each once, with document, decision date and owner S01. | | 3 | Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked `MIL-*` document | Pass | decision dates equal the Target Date of each MIL document and lie inside the window. | | 4 | Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage) | Pass | Scope Coverage maps every in-scope item to a gateway. | | 5 | Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order | Pass | chain MIL-001 to MIL-005 is acyclic and matches the order. | | 6 | The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go | Pass | Dependencies says later dates move and S01 decides the end date. | | 7 | Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI | N-A | owners are S01; no `GOV` document exists yet, so there is no RACI to cross-check. | | 8 | Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason | Pass | assumptions listed with source; no re-baseline yet. | | 9 | Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there | Pass | four plan risks with mitigation; the Wayback risk traces to the BC live-site risk. | | 10 | Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan | Pass | open issues listed; the repository question was answered by S01 in chat and is recorded in the milestone tasks. | | 11 | Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its `MIL-*` document | Pass | deliverables match the MIL Deliverable sections in substance. | | 12 | Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why | Pass | Stories column says "none (technical tasks)". | | 13 | The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other | Pass | table, Gantt and dependency chain agree. | | 14 | Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced | Pass | Milestone column says "not yet synced". | | 15 | The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History | Pass | single `project-plan.md`; Version History kept. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Language `en` and Domain `it` in Metadata. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Whole content is English. | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | IT Executive English for BC and PP, IT Professional English for SA and MIL, per the registry; MIL/BC/PP keep short, decision-oriented sentences. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No `DICT` exists; terms are standard IT terms (scraping, fixture, workflow). No synonyms found for them. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `*.en.md` or other twin exists in `docs/`. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version in this language; no change since an accepted version. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Stand-in for S01 (Product Owner, developer) confirms the IT terms; not independent (autonomous mode). | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (PO, SA, MIL, CI, BC) are defined in the framework and used consistently; PO is spelled out in the SA. | ## Overall Verdict Go — no Mandatory criterion fails and none is Pending. The review is a stand-in review by the author's tool for S01 in autonomous mode and is not independent; S01 challenges it in the run summary. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | 2026-10-28 | --- [PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md [QC-PP-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-project-plan.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [dcef5e6]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/045-scrape-movies/commit/dcef5e6e6e7ec16162817d3ec0ce1b303e0a3a63