MIL-001: repository setup and tooling #35
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ document of a type. `Primary File` may contain a glob (e.g.
|
|||||||
| SA | Stakeholder Analysis | docs/stakeholder-analysis.md | 002 |
|
| SA | Stakeholder Analysis | docs/stakeholder-analysis.md | 002 |
|
||||||
| PP | Project Plan | docs/project-plan.md | 002 |
|
| PP | Project Plan | docs/project-plan.md | 002 |
|
||||||
| MIL | Milestone / Gateway | docs/milestones/*.md | 006 |
|
| MIL | Milestone / Gateway | docs/milestones/*.md | 006 |
|
||||||
| RC | SQA Review Record | docs/sqa/reviews/rc-*.md | 009 |
|
| RC | SQA Review Record | docs/sqa/reviews/rc-*.md | 012 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Languages
|
## Languages
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Review of MIL-001 Python code
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Metadata
|
||||||
|
| Key | Value |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| ID | RC-009 |
|
||||||
|
| CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-PY-001] |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Version History
|
||||||
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 (AI as stand-in, autonomous mode) | Initial version | pending |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
|
||||||
|
- Checklist used: [QC-PY-001]
|
||||||
|
- Scope: full review. Code reviewed: pyproject.toml, src/, tests/ of the MIL-001 branch.
|
||||||
|
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
|
||||||
|
- Language reviewer: none
|
||||||
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Checklist Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 1 | Packages, modules, functions, variables, classes and constants follow PEP 8 casing (`snake_case`, `PascalCase`, `UPPER_SNAKE`) | Pass | `constants.py` uses UPPER_SNAKE; packages are snake_case. |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | Names state purpose in the domain's language; no unexplained abbreviations, no single-letter names outside tiny scopes | Pass | names state purpose (`REQUEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS`, `EMPIRE_WAYBACK_URL`). |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | Code is produced by the project's formatter and passes its linter with no unexplained suppressions | Pass | `ruff check` and `ruff format --check` clean; no `noqa`; only D203/D213 are configured off because they conflict with D211/D212. |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | Every function and method signature is type-annotated, including `-> None` | Pass | the one test function is annotated; `mypy --strict` has no error. |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | No bare `except:`, no swallowed exceptions; specific exceptions are raised and the cause is kept (`raise ... from`) | N-A | no exception handling exists yet. |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | No mutable default arguments and no shadowed builtins | Pass | none present. |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | Files, locks and connections are managed with context managers | N-A | no file or connection is opened yet. |
|
||||||
|
| 8 | Public modules, classes and functions have docstrings that say what, not how | Pass | every module has a Doxygen docstring. |
|
||||||
|
| 9 | Logging uses `logging`, not `print`; no secrets or personal data in log output | N-A | no logging exists yet. |
|
||||||
|
| 10 | Classes and operations trace to the Design Class Diagram they implement; deviations are recorded | N-A | no Design Class Diagram; every task of MIL-001 is a plain technical task (Needs Use Case: No). |
|
||||||
|
| 11 | Tests exist for new behaviour, are named for the behaviour, and do not depend on order or the network | Pass | `tests/unit/test_constants.py` is offline and independent of order. |
|
||||||
|
| 12 | Type checker runs in strict mode without errors; `Any` is justified in a comment | Pass | `mypy --strict` over `src` and `tests`. |
|
||||||
|
| 13 | Dependencies are declared and pinned in the project's dependency file, none unused | Fail | dependencies are declared with lower bounds, not pinned; this is a library-style project without a lock file. |
|
||||||
|
| 14 | Each piece of knowledge (a business rule, constant, format, validation or query) is defined in one place; code is merged only where it expresses the same knowledge, not where it merely looks alike | Pass | every constant is defined once in `constants.py`. |
|
||||||
|
| 15 | Imports point inward: business-rule modules import no framework, database, UI or delivery-mechanism code, and there are no import cycles | Pass | the layer packages hold no imports yet; no cycle is possible. |
|
||||||
|
| 16 | SOLID holds: a class or module has one reason to change; new behaviour is added by extension, not by editing a type test in several places; subclasses honour the contract of their base; protocols are narrow; high-level code depends on protocols or abstract types and receives its implementations | Pass | no class or branching on type exists yet. |
|
||||||
|
| 17 | Source is laid out in the layers and folders of the clean architecture folder structure (`domain`, `application`, `infrastructure`, `presentation` packages under `src/`, and `unit`, `integration` and `e2e` under `tests/`), in `snake_case`, and imports between the layers point inward | Pass | `domain`, `application`, `infrastructure` and `presentation` under `src/scrape_movies/`; `unit`, `integration`, `e2e` under `tests/`. |
|
||||||
|
| 18 | File and folder names are English, contain no space and no character outside letters, digits, `-`, `_` and `.`, and follow the casing of the language for files | Pass | all names are English lowercase with `_` and no space. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Overall Verdict
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Go — no Mandatory criterion fails and none is Pending. Stand-in review in autonomous mode, not independent; S01 challenges it in the run summary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Action Items
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| Decide whether to add a lock file for exact versions (optional criterion 13) | S01 | 2026-11-14 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-repository-setup.md
|
||||||
|
[QC-PY-001]: ../../../framework/qc/code/qc-programming-python.md
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Review of MIL-001 workflows
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Metadata
|
||||||
|
| Key | Value |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| ID | RC-010 |
|
||||||
|
| CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-WF-001] |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Version History
|
||||||
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 (AI as stand-in, autonomous mode) | Initial version | pending |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
|
||||||
|
- Checklist used: [QC-WF-001]
|
||||||
|
- Scope: full review. Code reviewed: .gitea/workflows/*.yml.
|
||||||
|
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
|
||||||
|
- Language reviewer: none
|
||||||
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Checklist Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 1 | The file meets the YAML checklist ([QC-YML-001]) | Pass | see RC-011 for QC-YML-001. |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | The file is in `.gitea/workflows/` or `.github/workflows/` with the extension `.yml` or `.yaml`, and the same workflow does not exist in both directories | Pass | all five files are `.yml` under `.gitea/workflows/`; none under `.github/`. |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | The file declares `name`, `on` and `jobs`; `on` lists explicit events and, where it matters, `branches` or `paths` | Pass | each declares `name`, `on` and `jobs`, with branches or paths where they matter. |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | A header comment states the purpose, the triggers, the inputs, the secrets it needs, what it changes outside the repository, and the decision or milestone it implements | Pass | every file opens with a header naming purpose, triggers, secrets, outside effects and MIL-001. |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | Every job and step has a descriptive `name`, unique within its job | Pass | every job and step has a unique `name`. |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | The file passes `actionlint` (or the project's workflow validation test) and the tool version is stated | Pass | actionlint 1.7.12 reports no finding; `gitea.*` contexts were replaced by `github.*` to satisfy it. |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | Every job declares `permissions` explicitly with the least access that works (`contents: read` or none by default); write access only on the job that needs it | Pass | every job sets `permissions`; write only on the metrics job. |
|
||||||
|
| 8 | Every action used is pinned to a full commit SHA or an exact release tag, never to a branch; a moving major tag (`@v1`) is accepted only for an action published by the same organisation under a stated release policy | Pass | actions are at exact tags (`checkout@v4.2.2`, `setup-python@v5.3.0`, `upload-artifact@v4.6.2`); the reusable workflows of the same organisation use the major tag `v2` as the organisation publishes it. |
|
||||||
|
| 9 | No secret is written in the file; a secret is read as `secrets.NAME`, passed to a step through `env:`, never placed on a command line or echoed | Pass | the only secret is read as `secrets.TOKEN_FOR_GITEA_SYNC` through `env:`. |
|
||||||
|
| 10 | Untrusted text (`inputs.*`, event fields such as a title, branch name or label, step outputs derived from them) is never interpolated into a `run:` script; it is passed through `env:` and used as a quoted variable | Pass | `inputs.dry_run` reaches the script only through `env:`. |
|
||||||
|
| 11 | A trigger that gives a run secrets or a write token on code from a fork or an untrusted branch (`pull_request_target`, `workflow_run`) does not check out or execute that code | Pass | no `pull_request_target` or `workflow_run`. |
|
||||||
|
| 12 | A workflow that changes state outside the repository (release, tag, publish, sync, deploy) is started by hand or by a protected branch, and a manual run defaults to a dry run with an explicit input to apply | Pass | `sync-milestones` runs on main or by hand and defaults to a dry run on a manual start. |
|
||||||
|
| 13 | The token the workflow uses has only the scope the job needs, and where the host's built-in token is enough it is used instead of a personal token | N-A | the token is created by S01; its scope cannot be checked here. |
|
||||||
|
| 14 | Every job sets `runs-on` to an explicit label and `timeout-minutes` | Pass | every job with `runs-on` sets `ubuntu-latest` and `timeout-minutes`; called workflows set their own. |
|
||||||
|
| 15 | `concurrency` is set where two runs would conflict: a check cancels the older run (`cancel-in-progress: true`); a publishing job queues (`cancel-in-progress: false`) | Pass | checks cancel older runs; the publishing job queues. |
|
||||||
|
| 16 | Triggers are filtered (`branches`, `paths`, `types`) so the workflow runs only for the changes it concerns | Pass | triggers use `branches` or `paths`. |
|
||||||
|
| 17 | Tools and dependencies are installed at pinned versions; a version is a workflow input with a default or a value in one place | Pass | Python 3.13 and the tool versions come from one place, `pyproject.toml`; actionlint and yamllint were run by hand at the versions stated here. |
|
||||||
|
| 18 | A dependency cache is used where the install is slow enough to matter | N-A | the install is small enough that a cache does not matter. |
|
||||||
|
| 19 | A failing step names the tool, the file and the reason in its log (annotation or `::error::` line) | N-A | the called tools write their own annotations. |
|
||||||
|
| 20 | A `run:` block is within the limit on embedded program text of criterion 7 of [QC-YML-001]; a longer script is a file (`tools/`, or a shared repository fetched at a pinned ref) that the step calls with one command, and the workflow passes its settings through `env:` | Pass | no `run:` block exceeds five lines. |
|
||||||
|
| 21 | Logic used by more than one workflow or repository is a reusable workflow (`workflow_call`) or a composite action; each input has a `description`, a `type` and a `default` where one is sensible | Pass | quality, comments and metrics reuse the shared workflows with `uses:`. |
|
||||||
|
| 22 | Every workflow feature used is verified on the instance that runs it, and the host and version are recorded; a feature the target hosts differ on is noted in the header | Pass | on pull request 35 on git.tirsystem.com the tests, quality and English-comments runs completed with success. |
|
||||||
|
| 23 | A reusable workflow states, in its header, how a caller pins it and the script it fetches, so the workflow and its script are the same release | Pass | the headers say the callers use the major tag `v2` of the same organisation. |
|
||||||
|
| 24 | A static test of the repository's workflows exists and runs on every pull request: valid YAML, required keys, explicit permissions and runner, no inline script above the limit | Fail | no static workflow test runs in this repository; actionlint was run by hand. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Overall Verdict
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Go — no Mandatory criterion fails and none is Pending. Stand-in review in autonomous mode, not independent; S01 challenges it in the run summary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Action Items
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| Add a static workflow test (optional criterion 24) | S01 | 2026-11-14 |
|
||||||
|
| Create the secret TOKEN_FOR_GITEA_SYNC (S01 only; the AI does not create secrets) | S01 | 2026-11-14 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-repository-setup.md
|
||||||
|
[QC-WF-001]: ../../../framework/qc/code/qc-workflow.md
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Review of MIL-001 YAML files
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Metadata
|
||||||
|
| Key | Value |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| ID | RC-011 |
|
||||||
|
| CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-YML-001] |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Version History
|
||||||
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 (AI as stand-in, autonomous mode) | Initial version | pending |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
|
||||||
|
- Checklist used: [QC-YML-001]
|
||||||
|
- Scope: full review. Code reviewed: .gitea/workflows/*.yml, .yamllint.yml.
|
||||||
|
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
|
||||||
|
- Language reviewer: none
|
||||||
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Checklist Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 1 | The file parses with a safe YAML loader and has no duplicate keys in any mapping | Pass | yamllint 1.38.0 (PyYAML based) parses all files and reports no duplicate key. |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | Indentation is 2 spaces everywhere, never tabs; lines end with LF; the file ends with one newline and has no trailing spaces | Pass | 2 spaces, LF, one final newline, no trailing spaces (yamllint relaxed profile). |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | Passes `yamllint` (or the project's YAML linter) with its configuration committed next to the code and no unexplained `disable` comments | Pass | `.yamllint.yml` is committed; no disable comments. |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | A scalar that YAML would coerce to another type is quoted: `yes`, `no`, `on`, `off`, `null`, `~`, numbers with a leading zero, versions such as `1.10`, and values that contain `: ` or ` #` | Pass | strings such as `"3.13"` are quoted; `on` is the Actions trigger key, not a value. |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | Only safe, plain types are used: no language-specific tags (`!!python/object`, `!ruby/object`) and no `!include`-style extension unless the consuming tool documents it | Pass | only plain types. |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | No secret is written in the file: no password, token, key or private connection string; a secret is referenced by name and supplied by the consuming tool | Pass | no secret in any file. |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | Embedded program text (shell, Python, SQL, `jq`, and so on) in a value is at most five lines; a longer one is moved to a file of its own, in its own language, and the YAML calls it | Pass | the longest `run:` block has two lines. |
|
||||||
|
| 8 | A block of keys or values repeated in the file or across files is defined once (an anchor, a template, an include or a reusable unit the consumer supports) | Pass | repeated blocks are not present; shared logic is reused through `uses:`. |
|
||||||
|
| 9 | Anchors, aliases and merge keys (`&`, `*`, `<<`) are used only where the consuming tool is known to support them | Pass | no anchors or aliases. |
|
||||||
|
| 10 | The file validates against the schema of the consuming tool where one exists, and the schema or tool version is stated | Pass | actionlint 1.7.12 validates the workflow schema. |
|
||||||
|
| 11 | A header comment states what the file is for, which tool reads it, and where its decision or design is recorded | Pass | each file has a header comment saying purpose, reader and where it is decided (MIL-001). |
|
||||||
|
| 12 | Key names follow the convention of the consuming tool; one case style is used within the file (kebab-case or snake_case, never mixed) | Pass | key names are those of the consuming tool (`cancel-in-progress`, `timeout-minutes`, `dry_run`), as the tool defines them. |
|
||||||
|
| 13 | Multi-line strings use a block scalar (`\|` or `>`) and state the chomping indicator (`\|-`, `\|+`) where the trailing newline matters | Pass | no multi-line strings other than `run: |` blocks where the trailing newline does not matter. |
|
||||||
|
| 14 | The file name is lowercase kebab-case with one extension style (`.yml` or `.yaml`) used throughout the repository | Pass | lowercase kebab-case `.yml` names. |
|
||||||
|
| 15 | A change is exercised by a check that runs without the real target: a parse and schema test, or a dry run of the consuming tool | Pass | pull request 35 ran the workflows on the host. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Overall Verdict
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Go — no Mandatory criterion fails and none is Pending. Stand-in review in autonomous mode, not independent; S01 challenges it in the run summary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Action Items
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| None | S01 | 2026-11-14 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-repository-setup.md
|
||||||
|
[QC-YML-001]: ../../../framework/qc/code/qc-yaml.md
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user