# SQA Review Record ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-002 | | CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-24 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [e8d24b2] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [SA-001] - Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S03 have power and interest levels and a quadrant. | | 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01, S02, S03 are unique and used by the other documents. | | 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organisation, power and interest are explicit per row. | | 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones. | | 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts, each with a mitigation. | | 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability table maps each stakeholder to [BC-001] objectives. | | 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concerns are in business language and mapped to FURPS+. | | 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short, plain tables a stakeholder can check for their own row. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | The Language row is en and the Domain row is it. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; checked by the stand-in reviewer. | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register matches the registry row for this type. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (DICT) exists; the text uses plain IT vocabulary with no synonym pairs. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `..md` twin exists. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no earlier accepted language to compare. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The stand-in reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain; mode is autonomous, not independent. | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | ISO/IEC, SQA, QC and HTML are the only abbreviations and are standard IT terms. | ## Overall Verdict Go — every applicable criterion passes. The review is a stand-in review, not an independent one, and S01 can challenge it in the final summary. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | n/a | --- [SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [e8d24b2]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/041-web-movie-ranking/commit/e8d24b2d32ce1ef8276123b0efa05b8a15e27d52