040-personal-flight-club/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-001-business-case.md

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001, QC-LANG-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-24	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	c5a6ed5

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: BC-001
• Checklist used: QC-BC-001 and QC-LANG-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: none (the stand-in reads the language and knows the domain)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Cost-benefit is qualitative and the table says why (small project, cost is time only).
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Risks table has five risks, each with impact and mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Seven success criteria with targets and measures.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	In Scope and Out of Scope subsections present.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 only; no inline role descriptions.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Methodology and standards section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010 and coding skills.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Recommendation is a single 'Proceed' with rationale.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Language en and Domain it rows are in Metadata.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells are English.
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register matches the registry row for this type.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	The project has no domain dictionary (DICT); the document uses standard IT terms consistently, with no synonyms. Stand-in judgement.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No translated twin exists.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version; no language change.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	Confirmed by the stand-in for S01 (Product Owner, IT domain). Mode: autonomous, not independent.
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Fail	Optional: SMTP, API, CI and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out on first use. Action item below.

Overall Verdict

Go — all mandatory criteria pass; the one failed criterion is optional (QC-LANG-001 criterion 10) and has an action item.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Spell out the abbreviations (SMTP, API, CI, IATA) on first use in the README glossary	S01	2026-11-07

---