# SQA Review Record

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-17 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer is the stand-in for S01, who reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer: AI as stand-in for S01)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have power, interest and quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and used in the Business Case, milestones and plan. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organisation and HIGH/LOW levels are given, with a rationale per quadrant. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts (pandas vs no dependencies; secret vs public repository) with mitigations. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability section maps each stakeholder to objectives of BC-001. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concerns table maps each concern to a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain language, one table per topic. |

## Language and Domain Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` = en and `Domain` = it are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of the Stakeholder Analysis are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Professional English, as the registry gives for this type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No domain dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms used are standard IT terms (repository, pull request, milestone) with no synonyms. Confirmed by the stand-in, not independent. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `*.en.md` or other translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by AI as stand-in for S01 (English, IT domain). Mode is autonomous, not independent. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations used (SMTP, STARTTLS, CSV, PO) are spelled out or standard; SMTP is explained in the scope. |

## Overall Verdict

Go - All eight criteria pass. S01 is the only reviewer and was named by the user as reviewer.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | - |

---
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md