Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, use case chain (UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, DICT), three ADRs, milestones MIL-001 to MIL-007, the traceability matrix and 22 review records (autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
2.3 KiB
2.3 KiB
ADR-0003: Artifact types skipped for this project
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | ADR-0003 |
| CrossReference | BC-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
Allowed Status values: Proposed, Accepted, Rejected, Deprecated, Superseded by ADR-NNNN.
Context
The framework lists more artifact types than a one-week, single-person learning project needs. The journey of the create-project skill makes the baseline (BC, SA, PP, MIL) mandatory and every other type optional, but requires the reason for a skipped step to be recorded. Options: (1) create every type, which doubles the documents for one person and a 1000 word program; (2) create the baseline, the use case chain the code is traced to (UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, DICT) and skip the types that add no information here.
Decision
Option 2 is chosen. These types are not created in this project, for the reasons given:
| Type | Reason |
|---|---|
KPI, BMC, BPMN |
One owner, no revenue and no business process; the measurable success criteria are in the Business Case |
RA |
The idea is not a hunch: the assignment specifies the behaviour, so there is no belief to test before the Business Case |
GOV |
One person owns, builds and approves; the review workflow is the framework's own and the autonomous mode records stand-in reviews |
ERD |
The only persistence is two CSV files with the same two columns, described in the adapters of the Design Class Diagram |
TRN, TRR |
No reviewer training for a single-person project |
Consequences
Positive:
- Less documentation to keep in step for a small program.
- Reviews concentrate on the documents that carry the decisions.
Negative:
- A later contributor finds no governance document; the review records show who stood in.
- If persistence grows beyond a CSV file, an
ERDmust be added in that change.
Affected Artifacts
- BC-001 — the success criterion on review coverage counts only created artifacts