MIL-013 plan and documents: container and sandbox checks
Milestone MIL-013 (Debian container with GNOME, Windows Sandbox for the executable), ADR-0005, BC-001 and PP-001 updated. Review records RC-073 to RC-076, all Go (autonomous mode, not independent). Task: MIL-013#1
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
# RC-073: Review of BC-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-073 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-15 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | The Cost-Benefit table is qualitative and says why: no revenue is expected, so a quantitative return does not apply. |
|
||||
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | The Risks table has 5 risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
|
||||
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | The Success Criteria table has 8 rows with numeric targets and a measure each (for example 0 third-party packages; 5 commands or fewer). |
|
||||
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | Scope has `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope`; the container and sandbox checks are In Scope; macOS and other virtual machines are Out of Scope. |
|
||||
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and does not re-describe their roles. |
|
||||
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, Larman, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and PEP 8. |
|
||||
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
|
||||
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation reads `Proceed` with a one-sentence rationale. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of BC-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Executive English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
||||
|
||||
Full review (not a delta) after the change for MIL-013 (container and sandbox checks).
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[BC-001]: ../../../docs/business-case.md
|
||||
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||
# RC-074: Review of PP-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-074 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [PP-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-15 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [PP-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: none exists for this type, and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of PP-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Executive English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — no checklist exists for the Project Plan type; the plan now schedules MIL-013 on 2026-10-19 inside the Business Case constraint (delivery by 2026-10-21) and the language checklist passes. Accepted as the Product Owner's stand-in, after the Product Owner accepted the MIL-013 plan in chat. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[PP-001]: ../../../docs/project-plan.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||
# RC-075: Review of ADR-0005
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-075 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [ADR-0005], [QC-ADR-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-15 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [ADR-0005]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-ADR-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The ID (`ADR-NNNN`, 4-digit) matches the filename number and is unique and sequential | Pass | ID `ADR-0005` matches the file name number. |
|
||||
| 2 | Context states the problem, the forces (cost, risk, constraints) and the options evaluated | Pass | Context states the problem (the host desktop is taken over) and four options. |
|
||||
| 3 | At least two options were considered, or the absence of alternatives is justified | Pass | Four options were considered. |
|
||||
| 4 | Decision is stated in one or two unhedged sentences and matches one of the evaluated options | Pass | Decision is stated plainly and is option 2. |
|
||||
| 5 | Consequences list both Positive and Negative outcomes | Pass | Consequences have Positive and Negative lists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Quality-attribute impacts (performance, security, portability, etc.) are named where the decision affects them | Pass | Portability, repeatability, image size and the weaker fallback are named. |
|
||||
| 7 | Affected Artifacts are listed as links, and each is also in CrossReference | Pass | Affected Artifacts BC-001 and ADR-0004 are listed and in CrossReference. |
|
||||
| 8 | Status changes are recorded as new Version History rows with a Change summary and Commit link; retained rows are never rewritten | Pass | First version; no status change yet. |
|
||||
| 9 | A superseded or deprecated ADR names its successor, and the successor links back | N-A | Not superseded or deprecated. |
|
||||
| 10 | Written in business or technical language of the domain, with no unexplained abbreviations | Pass | Written in plain technical English; product names are as the vendors write them. |
|
||||
| 11 | Status is one of `Proposed`, `Accepted`, `Rejected`, `Deprecated` or `Superseded by ADR-NNNN`, and every Version History row uses only these | Pass | Status `Proposed` before this review; uses an allowed value. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| none | - | - |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[ADR-0005]: ../../../docs/adr/adr-0005-container-and-sandbox-checks.md
|
||||
[QC-ADR-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-adr.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
# RC-076: Review of MIL-013
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-076 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-013], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-15 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-013]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | A concrete Deliverable section names the output evaluated at the gate. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has numbered criteria, each with an observable Go and No-Go. |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table names the milestone or documents it needs. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table maps to Business Case objectives and the user story. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table names S01 as owner and approving reviewer. |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date lies inside the 2026-10-14 to 2026-10-21 window of the Business Case. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of MIL-013 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Executive English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-013]: ../../../docs/milestones/mil-013-container-checks.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user