Add the plan baseline: business case, stakeholders, plan, design and milestones
Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, use case chain (UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, DICT), three ADRs, milestones MIL-001 to MIL-007, the traceability matrix and 22 review records (autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
||||
# RC-009: Review of OC-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-009 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [OC-001], [QC-OC-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [OC-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-OC-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Method signature is complete: operation name, parameter types, and return type | Pass | Each contract gives name, parameter list and return type (`startStudySession(): CardDto | None`). |
|
||||
| 2 | Preconditions explicitly list required state before execution | Pass | Preconditions are listed per contract. |
|
||||
| 3 | Postconditions explicitly describe resulting state using Larman's "instance created/associated/attribute modified" style | Pass | Postconditions use created / associated / destroyed / attribute set wording. |
|
||||
| 4 | Exceptions and error conditions are documented, including the triggering precondition failure | Pass | Each contract has an Exceptions table with the failing precondition. |
|
||||
| 5 | Operation is explicitly traceable to a single SSD message | Pass | Each contract traces to exactly one SSD message; the timer step has none and says so. |
|
||||
| 6 | Contract avoids specifying implementation/algorithmic details (declarative, not procedural) | Pass | Postconditions are declarative. |
|
||||
| 7 | Cross-references the Domain Model classes/associations affected by pre/postconditions | Pass | Domain Model concepts and IT terms are cited per contract. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| none | - | - |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[OC-001]: ../../../docs/uc-001/oc.md
|
||||
[QC-OC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-operation-contract.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user