Add the plan baseline: business case, stakeholders, plan, design and milestones

Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, use case chain
(UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, DICT), three ADRs, milestones
MIL-001 to MIL-007, the traceability matrix and 22 review records
(autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-14 21:33:25 +08:00
parent 97eec837a4
commit c3fbcbcfaf
49 changed files with 3484 additions and 0 deletions
+66
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
# RC-007: Review of DM-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-007 |
| CrossReference | [DM-001], [QC-DM-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [DM-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-DM-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Uses ubiquitous/business language throughout; no technical or implementation jargon (e.g. no "table", "class", "pointer") | Pass | Concepts are Flash Card, Word List, Words To Learn and Study Session; no table or class names. |
| 2 | Multiplicities on associations are correct and complete (e.g. `1..*`, `0..1`) | Pass | Association table gives both multiplicities for all 5 associations. |
| 3 | No operation/method signatures shown — attributes and associations only | Pass | The diagram has attributes and associations only. |
| 4 | Associations are named with an unambiguous reading direction | Pass | Every association is named with a reading direction (`holds`, `works through`). |
| 5 | Generalization/specialization used correctly, reflecting true "is-a" relationships, not misused for code reuse | Pass | Generalization table says none exists, and why. |
| 6 | Every concept traces to a noun phrase found in the use cases or glossary | Pass | Concept table gives a source noun phrase in UC-001 for every concept. |
| 7 | Attributes are simple domain data (no foreign-key-like references or object pointers modeled as attributes) | Pass | Attributes are plain data (word, translation, first language, card shown). |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of DM-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[DM-001]: ../../../docs/domain-model.md
[QC-DM-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-domain-model.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md