Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/031-flash-card
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

MIL-008 plan and design: choose level (100, 1000 or all words)

Browse Source 
New milestone MIL-008 with story US-001.06, and the design documents
updated for the level choice: BC-001, PP-001, US-001, UC-001, DM-001,
DICT-001, SSD-001, OC-001, SD-001, DCD-001 and the wireframe. Review
records RC-030 to RC-040, all Go (autonomous mode, not independent).

Task: MIL-008#1
This commit is contained in:
Tirsvad
2026-10-14 23:44:59 +08:00
parent 13673b2c48
commit 0b983b7fda
25 changed files with 1963 additions and 1002 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-030-business-case-level.md
+69
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
# RC-030: Review of BC-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-030 |
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | The Cost-Benefit table is qualitative and says why: no revenue is expected, so a quantitative return does not apply. |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | The Risks table has 5 risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | The Success Criteria table has 8 rows with numeric targets and a measure each (for example 0 third-party packages; 5 commands or fewer). |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | Scope has `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` subsections. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and does not re-describe their roles. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, Larman, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and PEP 8. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation reads `Proceed` with a one-sentence rationale. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of BC-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Executive English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[BC-001]: ../../../docs/business-case.md
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-031-user-stories-level.md
+69
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
# RC-031: Review of US-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-031 |
| CrossReference | [US-001], [QC-US-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [US-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-US-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Follows INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable) | Pass | INVEST Check section confirms the six properties for all six stories and states one dependency exception. |
| 2 | Written in "As a / I want / So that" form | Pass | All six stories use `As a / I want / so that`. |
| 3 | Clear, testable acceptance criteria are included | Pass | Every story, including US-001.06, has Given/When/Then acceptance criteria. |
| 4 | Traceable to a use case or epic | Pass | Every story traces to a milestone and to UC-001. |
| 5 | Story is sized to fit within a single iteration | Pass | Each story is one milestone, which fits one iteration. |
| 6 | Story statement avoids technical implementation detail | Fail | Acceptance criteria name `words_to_learn.csv`, `ms-da.csv` and 3000 ms, which are assignment-mandated names and values rather than pure behaviour. |
| 7 | Role named in the story matches an actor defined in the Use Case Diagram | Pass | The role `Learner` is the actor of UCD-001. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of US-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion 6 (Optional) failed: Story statement avoids technical implementation detail; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[US-001]: ../../../docs/user-stories.md
[QC-US-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-user-story.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-032-project-plan-level.md
+53
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# RC-032: Review of PP-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-032 |
| CrossReference | [PP-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [PP-001]
- Checklist used: none exists for this type, and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of PP-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Executive English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — no checklist exists for the Project Plan type; the plan now schedules MIL-008 on 2026-10-20 inside the Business Case constraint (delivery by 2026-10-21) and the language checklist passes. Accepted as the Product Owner's stand-in, after the Product Owner accepted the MIL-008 plan in chat. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[PP-001]: ../../../docs/project-plan.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-033-use-case-level.md
+73
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
# RC-033: Review of UC-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-033 |
| CrossReference | [UC-001], [QC-UC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [UC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | N-A | The format is Fully Dressed; the Brief format criterion does not apply. |
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | The format is Fully Dressed; the Casual format criterion does not apply. |
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | Pass | Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions, main success scenario and extensions are present. |
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Preconditions and postconditions are listed. |
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Primary actor is `Learner`. |
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | Stakeholders S01 and S02 and their interests are stated. |
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | Pass | Main success scenario has 9 numbered steps, including the level choice (steps 2 and 3). |
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | Pass | UCD-001 has no include or extend relationship, so no extension needs to reference one; the extensions (3a, 4a, 5a, 7a, 7b, 9a) are plain alternative flows. |
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | Pass | The Business Rules table gives a rule per step. |
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001; the level step matches US-001.06. |
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | `Level: user-goal` and `Scope: Flash Card program`. |
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Steps are written as goals and answers; buttons, files and milliseconds are in the wireframe and milestones. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of UC-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[UC-001]: ../../../docs/uc-001/uc.md
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-use-case.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-034-domain-model-level.md
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# RC-034: Review of DM-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-034 |
| CrossReference | [DM-001], [QC-DM-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [DM-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-DM-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Uses ubiquitous/business language throughout; no technical or implementation jargon (e.g. no "table", "class", "pointer") | Pass | Concepts are Flash Card, Word List, Words To Learn, Level and Study Session; no table or class names. |
| 2 | Multiplicities on associations are correct and complete (e.g. `1..*`, `0..1`) | Pass | Association table gives both multiplicities for all 7 associations. |
| 3 | No operation/method signatures shown — attributes and associations only | Pass | The diagram has attributes and associations only. |
| 4 | Associations are named with an unambiguous reading direction | Pass | Every association is named with a reading direction (`holds`, `works through`, `is limited to`, `takes the first words of`). |
| 5 | Generalization/specialization used correctly, reflecting true "is-a" relationships, not misused for code reuse | Pass | Generalization table says none exists, and why. |
| 6 | Every concept traces to a noun phrase found in the use cases or glossary | Pass | Concept table gives a source noun phrase in UC-001 for every concept. |
| 7 | Attributes are simple domain data (no foreign-key-like references or object pointers modeled as attributes) | Pass | Attributes are plain data (word, translation, first language, card shown). |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of DM-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[DM-001]: ../../../docs/domain-model.md
[QC-DM-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-domain-model.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-035-domain-dictionary-level.md
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# RC-035: Review of DICT-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-035 |
| CrossReference | [DICT-001], [QC-DICT-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [DICT-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-DICT-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Every row has a PO term, its language, an IT term and a definition | Pass | All 8 rows have PO term, language, IT term and definition. |
| 2 | Each PO term maps to exactly one IT term and the reverse (no synonyms) | Pass | One IT term per PO term; no synonym appears. |
| 3 | Every Domain Model concept has a row, and the Domain Model uses its PO term | Pass | The 5 concepts of DM-001 have a row (`Level` added) and DM-001 uses the PO term. |
| 4 | The Operation Contracts, Sequence Diagrams, Design Class Diagrams and ERD use the IT term, not the PO term | Pass | DCD-001, OC-001 and SD-001 use `Card`, `Vocabulary`, `Deck`, `StudySession`. |
| 5 | Definitions are written in the PO language and are one sentence | Pass | Definitions are one English sentence each. |
| 6 | "Used as PO term in" and "Used as IT term in" name artifact types that exist in the project | Pass | Artifact types named in both columns exist in the project. |
| 7 | The dictionary's `Language` and `Domain` rows, and the language of every row, match the PO language and domain in the project registry | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` match the registry; every row says `en`. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of DICT-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[DICT-001]: ../../../docs/dictionary.md
[QC-DICT-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-dictionary.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-036-system-sequence-diagram-level.md
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# RC-036: Review of SSD-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-036 |
| CrossReference | [SSD-001], [QC-SSD-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SSD-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SSD-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Input/output messages match the corresponding Use Case's main success scenario step-for-step | Pass | System Operations table maps each message to steps of the main success scenario (1 to 9); the timer step is the one stated deviation. |
| 2 | Actor and System are treated strictly as black boxes (system shown as `:System`) | Pass | The system is `:System`; no internal object appears. |
| 3 | Object creation/destruction of the System instance handled explicitly where relevant | Pass | Lifecycle Notes state that the system lives for one run. |
| 4 | Return values are shown for operations that produce one, using dashed return arrows | Pass | Dashed return arrows are drawn for `startStudySession`, `chooseLevel`, the turn-over, `markKnown` and `markUnknown`. |
| 5 | Alternate/exceptional flows are represented separately (or explicitly out of scope noted) | Pass | The Alternate Flows section names extensions 3a, 4a, 5a, 7b and 9a, states that they add no operation, and says they are out of scope. |
| 6 | Message names are verb phrases consistent with the use case's system responsibilities | Pass | `startStudySession`, `markKnown` and `markUnknown` are verb phrases. |
| 7 | Diagram references the specific Use Case (name and ID) it depicts | Pass | Source Use Case section names UC-001 and the scenario. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of SSD-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[SSD-001]: ../../../docs/uc-001/ssd.md
[QC-SSD-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-ssd.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-037-operation-contracts-level.md
+52
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
# RC-037: Review of OC-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-037 |
| CrossReference | [OC-001], [QC-OC-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [OC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-OC-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Method signature is complete: operation name, parameter types, and return type | Pass | Each contract gives name, parameter list and return type (`startStudySession(): CardDto | None`). |
| 2 | Preconditions explicitly list required state before execution | Pass | Preconditions are listed per contract. |
| 3 | Postconditions explicitly describe resulting state using Larman's "instance created/associated/attribute modified" style | Pass | Postconditions use created / associated / destroyed / attribute set wording. |
| 4 | Exceptions and error conditions are documented, including the triggering precondition failure | Pass | Each contract has an Exceptions table with the failing precondition. |
| 5 | Operation is explicitly traceable to a single SSD message | Pass | Each of the four contracts (`startStudySession`, `chooseLevel`, `markKnown`, `markUnknown`) traces to exactly one SSD message; the timer step has none and says so. |
| 6 | Contract avoids specifying implementation/algorithmic details (declarative, not procedural) | Pass | Postconditions are declarative. |
| 7 | Cross-references the Domain Model classes/associations affected by pre/postconditions | Pass | Domain Model concepts and IT terms are cited per contract. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| none | - | - |
---
[OC-001]: ../../../docs/uc-001/oc.md
[QC-OC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-operation-contract.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-038-sequence-diagrams-level.md
+53
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# RC-038: Review of SD-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-038 |
| CrossReference | [SD-001], [QC-SD-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SD-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SD-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Message passing strictly follows UML sync/async/return arrow syntax | Pass | Calls are solid arrows with dashed returns. |
| 2 | GRASP/GoF patterns applied and explicitly annotated where used (e.g. Controller, Observer, Mediator, Factory) | Pass | Each sequence has a Pattern Annotations table (Creator, Information Expert, Null Object, MVVM, Repository). |
| 3 | Lifelines show activation bars matching actual processing time/call nesting | Pass | Activations are drawn for the session and the view model. |
| 4 | Object creation and destruction shown with correct UML notation (`create`/`destroy` messages, X on lifeline) | Pass | `create` is used for `Deck` and `StudySession`; no object is destroyed during the program's life and that is stated by omission, the process ends. |
| 5 | Diagram realizes the postconditions of a specific Operation Contract | Pass | Each of the four sequences has a Postcondition Coverage table for its contract in OC-001. |
| 6 | Responsibility assignment favors low coupling/high cohesion (no god-object receiving all messages) | Pass | Responsibility Check notes state that no object receives all messages. |
| 7 | Loop, alt, and opt combined fragments used correctly for conditional/repeated behavior | Pass | `alt` and `opt` fragments are used for the progress file and the empty deck. |
| 8 | Each exception of the realized Operation Contract is shown as an `alt` or `opt` fragment, or its absence is justified | Fail | The exceptions of OC-001 (missing file, malformed file) are raised before the sequence starts and are not drawn as `alt` fragments; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion 8 (Optional) failed: Each exception of the realized Operation Contract is shown as an `alt` or `opt` fragment, ; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[SD-001]: ../../../docs/uc-001/sd.md
[QC-SD-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-sequence-diagram.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-039-design-class-diagram-level.md
+54
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
# RC-039: Review of DCD-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-039 |
| CrossReference | [DCD-001], [QC-DCD-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [DCD-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-DCD-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | SOLID principles applied; no god classes with excessive responsibilities | Pass | Each class has one responsibility (Class Table); view, view model, session, deck and adapters are separate. |
| 2 | Visibility markers correct and consistent (`+` public, `-` private, `#` protected) | Pass | Visibility markers are on all members. |
| 3 | Relationships correctly distinguished: Association vs Aggregation vs Composition vs Dependency | Pass | Composition (Vocabulary and Card), aggregation (Deck), composition (LevelViewModel and LevelChoice), association, dependency and realization are distinguished. |
| 4 | Multiplicities and navigability specified on all associations | Pass | Multiplicities are on the associations; dependencies are directed. |
| 5 | Applied design patterns are annotated explicitly (e.g. Singleton, Factory, Strategy) | Pass | Pattern Annotations table lists Repository, Ports and adapters, Null Object, MVVM, Composition root. |
| 6 | Method signatures are traceable to Operation Contracts and/or design Sequence Diagrams | Pass | Method Traceability table maps every operation, including `Level.first`, `Deck.within`, `LevelViewModel.choices` and `LevelView.choose`, to OC-001 and SD-001. |
| 7 | Class names and structure remain consistent with the Domain Model concepts they refine | Pass | The Class Table has a `Refines` column; `Level` refines the concept Level of DM-001; names match the dictionary's IT terms. |
| 8 | No circular dependencies between classes/packages unless explicitly justified | Pass | Dependency Check states there are no cycles. |
| 9 | Dependencies between classes and packages point inward: domain classes do not depend on infrastructure, delivery or framework classes | Pass | Domain imports nothing; infrastructure and presentation point inward (Dependency Check). |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| none | - | - |
---
[DCD-001]: ../../../docs/dcd.md
[QC-DCD-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-dcd.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-040-mil-008.md
+65
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# RC-040: Review of MIL-008
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-040 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-008], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-008]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | A concrete Deliverable section names the output evaluated at the gate. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has numbered criteria, each with an observable Go and No-Go. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table names the milestone or documents it needs. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table maps to Business Case objectives and the user story. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table names S01 as owner and approving reviewer. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date lies inside the 2026-10-14 to 2026-10-21 window of the Business Case. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of MIL-008 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Executive English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
---
[MIL-008]: ../../../docs/milestones/mil-008-choose-level.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/traceability-matrix.md
+25 -11
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [c3fbcbc] |
| 2026-10-14 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [c3fbcbc] |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Added MIL-008 and the review records of the level choice (no checklist exists for this type) | pending |
---
@@ -23,18 +24,18 @@ updated whenever an artifact instance is created or reviewed.
| Artifact Instance | Type | Language | Domain | Upstream (Backward Link) | Downstream (Forward Link) | Last Reviewed (RC-ID) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BC-001 | Business Case | en | it | - | SA-001, PP-001 | [RC-001] |
| BC-001 | Business Case | en | it | - | SA-001, PP-001 | [RC-030] |
| SA-001 | Stakeholder Analysis | en | it | BC-001 | PP-001, DICT-001 | [RC-002] |
| PP-001 | Project Plan | en | it | BC-001, SA-001 | MIL-001 to MIL-007 | [RC-003] |
| PP-001 | Project Plan | en | it | BC-001, SA-001 | MIL-001 to MIL-008 | [RC-032] |
| UCD-001 | Use Case Diagram | en | it | SA-001, BC-001 | US-001, UC-001 | [RC-004] |
| US-001 | User Story | en | it | UCD-001, BC-001 | MIL-002 to MIL-006 | [RC-005] |
| UC-001 | Use Case | en | it | UCD-001, US-001 | DM-001, SSD-001 | [RC-006] |
| DM-001 | Domain Model | en | it | UC-001 | SSD-001, DICT-001, DCD-001 | [RC-007] |
| SSD-001 | System Sequence Diagram | en | it | UC-001, DM-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-008] |
| OC-001 | Operation Contract | - | - | SSD-001, DM-001 | SD-001 | [RC-009] |
| SD-001 | Sequence Diagram | - | - | OC-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-010] |
| DCD-001 | Design Class Diagram | - | - | DM-001, SD-001, DICT-001 | src/flash_card | [RC-011] |
| DICT-001 | Domain Dictionary | en | it | BC-001, SA-001, DM-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-012] |
| US-001 | User Story | en | it | UCD-001, BC-001 | MIL-002 to MIL-006, MIL-008 | [RC-031] |
| UC-001 | Use Case | en | it | UCD-001, US-001 | DM-001, SSD-001 | [RC-033] |
| DM-001 | Domain Model | en | it | UC-001 | SSD-001, DICT-001, DCD-001 | [RC-034] |
| SSD-001 | System Sequence Diagram | en | it | UC-001, DM-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-036] |
| OC-001 | Operation Contract | - | - | SSD-001, DM-001 | SD-001 | [RC-037] |
| SD-001 | Sequence Diagram | - | - | OC-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-038] |
| DCD-001 | Design Class Diagram | - | - | DM-001, SD-001, DICT-001 | src/flash_card | [RC-039] |
| DICT-001 | Domain Dictionary | en | it | BC-001, SA-001, DM-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-035] |
| ADR-0001 | Architecture Decision Record | - | - | BC-001 | MIL-001, MIL-003, MIL-006 | [RC-013] |
| ADR-0002 | Architecture Decision Record | - | - | BC-001 | DCD-001 | [RC-014] |
| ADR-0003 | Architecture Decision Record | - | - | BC-001 | - | [RC-015] |
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ updated whenever an artifact instance is created or reviewed.
| MIL-005 | Milestone / Gateway | en | it | BC-001, PP-001 | tasks of MIL-005 | [RC-020] |
| MIL-006 | Milestone / Gateway | en | it | BC-001, PP-001 | tasks of MIL-006 | [RC-021] |
| MIL-007 | Milestone / Gateway | en | it | BC-001, PP-001 | tasks of MIL-007 | [RC-022] |
| MIL-008 | Milestone / Gateway | en | it | BC-001, PP-001 | tasks of MIL-008 | [RC-040] |
| PY-MIL-001 | Python Source Code | - | - | DCD-001, ADR-0002 | - | [RC-023] |
| PY-MIL-002 | Python Source Code | - | - | DCD-001, ADR-0002 | - | [RC-024] |
| PY-MIL-003 | Python Source Code | - | - | DCD-001, ADR-0002 | - | [RC-025] |
@@ -120,3 +122,15 @@ updated whenever an artifact instance is created or reviewed.
[PY-MIL-006]: ../../src/flash_card
[RC-029]: ./reviews/rc-029-py-mil-007.md
[PY-MIL-007]: ../../src/flash_card
[RC-030]: ./reviews/rc-030-business-case-level.md
[RC-031]: ./reviews/rc-031-user-stories-level.md
[RC-032]: ./reviews/rc-032-project-plan-level.md
[RC-033]: ./reviews/rc-033-use-case-level.md
[RC-034]: ./reviews/rc-034-domain-model-level.md
[RC-035]: ./reviews/rc-035-domain-dictionary-level.md
[RC-036]: ./reviews/rc-036-system-sequence-diagram-level.md
[RC-037]: ./reviews/rc-037-operation-contracts-level.md
[RC-038]: ./reviews/rc-038-sequence-diagrams-level.md
[RC-039]: ./reviews/rc-039-design-class-diagram-level.md
[RC-040]: ./reviews/rc-040-mil-008.md
[MIL-008]: ../milestones/mil-008-choose-level.md