030-password-manager/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-002
CrossReference	SA-001, [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001]

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-14	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	53f56ee

---

Review of SA-001

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: SA-001
• Checklist used: [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001]
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: S01 (reads English and the IT domain; confirmed in chat by replying "accepted" to the plan message that asked for it)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries	Pass	S01, S02, S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant.
2	Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts	Pass	IDs S01-S03 are unique and stable.
3	Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description	Pass	Power and Interest are HIGH or LOW per stakeholder, with a rationale section.
4	Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones	Pass	Communication Requirements table gives channel, frequency, deliverable and milestone.
5	Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies	Pass	Conflicting Interests table has three conflicts, each with a mitigation.
6	Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives	Pass	Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to [BC-001] O1 to O4.
7	Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+)	Pass	Primary Concerns table gives business wording and a FURPS+ attribute.
8	Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry	Pass	Short tables and plain wording; each stakeholder finds their row at once.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Language en and Domain it rows are present and filled.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is BCP 47; it is in the registry's domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells are English; headings are English.
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register IT Professional English per the registry; the text matches the reader it assumes.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	PO terms of [DICT-001] (password entry, password file, search, window) are used; no synonym found.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No *.en.md or other translated twin exists beside the file.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version: no language change since an earlier accepted version.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	S01 is the language reviewer and confirmed the English text and IT terms.
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations (PO, MVVM, JSON) are spelled out or defined where first used.

Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion passes.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---