# SQA Review Record

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |

---

# Review of SA-001

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: S01 (reads English and the IT domain; confirmed in chat by replying "accepted" to the plan message that asked for it)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02, S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01-S03 are unique and stable. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Power and Interest are HIGH or LOW per stakeholder, with a rationale section. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements table gives channel, frequency, deliverable and milestone. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Conflicting Interests table has three conflicts, each with a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to [BC-001] O1 to O4. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Primary Concerns table gives business wording and a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short tables and plain wording; each stakeholder finds their row at once. |

## Language and Domain Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Language `en` and Domain `it` rows are present and filled. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; headings are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register `IT Professional English` per the registry; the text matches the reader it assumes. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | PO terms of [DICT-001] (password entry, password file, search, window) are used; no synonym found. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `*.en.md` or other translated twin exists beside the file. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version: no language change since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01 is the language reviewer and confirmed the English text and IT terms. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (PO, MVVM, JSON) are spelled out or defined where first used. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion passes.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | - |

---

[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md