# SQA Review Record RC-002: SA-001

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of SA-001 | [7212302] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | Stable IDs S01 to S03, used by the other artifacts. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role and organization are stated with explicit HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts, each with a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability table cites [BC-001] objectives O1 to O5. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern is mapped to a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short tables; each entry reads on its own. |

## Language and Domain Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Professional English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |

## Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-SA-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |

---

[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
[7212302]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/026-nato-alphabet/commit/7212302fb9d9fe411215d4702d56a7cfe8834f1a