# SQA Review Record RC-011: US-001

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-011 |
| CrossReference | [US-001], [QC-US-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of US-001 | pending |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [US-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-US-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Follows INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable) | Pass | INVEST check line in the document; one story, one console interaction. |
| 2 | Written in "As a / I want / So that" form | Pass | As a / I want / so that. |
| 3 | Clear, testable acceptance criteria are included | Pass | Three Given/When/Then criteria, each a pytest case. |
| 4 | Traceable to a use case or epic | Pass | Traces to [UC-001] and the epic [MIL-002]. |
| 5 | Story is sized to fit within a single iteration | Pass | Fits one iteration. |
| 6 | Story statement avoids technical implementation detail | Pass | No implementation detail. |
| 7 | Role named in the story matches an actor defined in the Use Case Diagram | Pass | Role `User` is the actor of [UCD-001]. |

## Language and Domain Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Professional English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists; the terms user, word, letter and code word are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Software and IT domain, English language; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-US-001 and QC-LANG-001 passes.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |

---

[US-001]: ../../user-stories.md
[QC-US-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-user-story.md