# SQA Review Record RC-012: UC-001

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-012 |
| CrossReference | [UC-001], [QC-UC-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of UC-001 | [1b7da4b] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [UC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | N-A | Format is Fully Dressed, not Brief. |
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Format is Fully Dressed, not Casual. |
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | Pass | Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions, main scenario, extensions, rules and open issues are present. |
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Preconditions and postconditions are stated. |
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Primary actor: User. |
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S01 and S02 with their interests. |
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | Pass | Four numbered steps. |
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | N-A | No other use case exists, so no include or extend is relevant; the alternative flow 3a is a plain extension. |
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | Pass | A Special Requirements table gives a rule per step. |
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Actor and title match [UCD-001] and [US-001]. |
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | Level: user-goal; scope: NATO alphabet tool. |
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Written from the goal of the User, with no interface detail. |

## Language and Domain Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Professional English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists; the terms user, word, letter and code word are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Software and IT domain, English language; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — every applicable Mandatory criterion passes. The task summary of MIL-002 said "brief"; the use case is Fully Dressed so that the system sequence diagram can follow its steps one by one.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |

---

[UC-001]: ../../uc-001/uc.md
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-use-case.md
[1b7da4b]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/026-nato-alphabet/commit/1b7da4bcf95f69bf009b0a1f3d0ab740ae77e340