Add baseline: Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, milestones and reviews
Accepts BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 with review records RC-001 to RC-005 (autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
# SQA Review Record RC-004: MIL-002
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-004 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-002], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of MIL-002 | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-002]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete output: working console program, tests, Doxygen comments, user story and use case. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has objectively checkable rows (commands and counts). |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table is filled. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites [BC-001] objectives. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01. |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the Project Plan window; the Business Case sets no calendar constraint. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text matches it. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-MIL-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| None | S01 | n/a |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-002]: ../../milestones/mil-002-nato-converter.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user