# RC-013: Code review of MIL-005 (screenshot, README, wiki; no Python file changed)

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-013 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-005], [QC-PY-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: the source and tests that [MIL-005] delivers (screenshot, README, wiki; no Python file changed)
- Checklist used: [QC-PY-001]
- Scope: full review of the files changed on the branch of the milestone
- Language and domain: n/a
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also wrote the code; the review of the files was done by the `python-developer` agent of the session)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Packages, modules, functions, variables, classes and constants follow PEP 8 casing (`snake_case`, `PascalCase`, `UPPER_SNAKE`) | N-A | MIL-005 changes no Python file (`git diff main --stat -- src tests` is empty); the files are a PNG, `README.md` and `wiki/`. |
| 2 | Names state purpose in the domain's language; no unexplained abbreviations, no single-letter names outside tiny scopes | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 3 | Code is produced by the project's formatter and passes its linter with no unexplained suppressions | Pass | `ruff check` and `ruff format --check` still exit 0 on the unchanged `src` and `tests`, checked in a fresh clone of the branch. |
| 4 | Every function and method signature is type-annotated, including `-> None` | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 5 | No bare `except:`, no swallowed exceptions; specific exceptions are raised and the cause is kept (`raise ... from`) | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 6 | No mutable default arguments and no shadowed builtins | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 7 | Files, locks and connections are managed with context managers | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 8 | Public modules, classes and functions have docstrings that say what, not how | Pass | `doxygen Doxyfile` exits 0 with no warnings in the fresh clone. |
| 9 | Logging uses `logging`, not `print`; no secrets or personal data in log output | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 10 | Classes and operations trace to the Design Class Diagram they implement; deviations are recorded | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 11 | Tests exist for new behaviour, are named for the behaviour, and do not depend on order or the network | Pass | In a fresh clone of the branch, following the README on Windows PowerShell (`python -m venv .venv`, `python -m pip install --upgrade pip`, `python -m pip install -e ".[dev]"`), `pytest` reports 39 passed and `python -m weather` exits 0 and prints the results of the lectures. |
| 12 | Type checker runs in strict mode without errors; `Any` is justified in a comment | Pass | `python -m mypy` runs with `strict = true`: no issues in 12 source files in the fresh clone. |
| 13 | Dependencies are declared and pinned in the project's dependency file, none unused | N-A | No dependency change. |
| 14 | Each piece of knowledge (a business rule, constant, format, validation or query) is defined in one place; code is merged only where it expresses the same knowledge, not where it merely looks alike | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 15 | Imports point inward: business-rule modules import no framework, database, UI or delivery-mechanism code, and there are no import cycles | N-A | No Python file changed. |
| 16 | SOLID holds: a class or module has one reason to change; new behaviour is added by extension, not by editing a type test in several places; subclasses honour the contract of their base; protocols are narrow; high-level code depends on protocols or abstract types and receives its implementations | N-A | No Python file changed. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that wrote the code, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. The pull request is the second look. The deliverables of [MIL-005] that are not code were checked against its Go/No-Go list: the screenshot is a capture of a real console window that ran `python -m weather` (taken once with a one-off script outside the repository, not part of the change; the capture was cropped to the window so that no neighbouring window shows); the README and the three wiki pages show it; the wiki has `Home`, `Home.da`, `Home.ms` and `_Sidebar`; the marker `wiki/.publish` is added (a small addition to the task list: it is what makes the instance's workflow publish the pages). The address of the image on `main` and the publication of the wiki are checked after the merge and reported in the run summary.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-23 |

---

[MIL-005]: ../../milestones/mil-005-screenshot-wiki-and-finish.md
[QC-PY-001]: ../../../framework/qc/code/qc-programming-python.md
[PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md