# RC-002: Review of SA-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-002 | | CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [SA-001] - Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have a Power level, an Interest level and a quadrant. | | 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and are the IDs used in [BC-001], [PP-001] and the milestones. | | 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | The summary table gives role, organization and the levels, with a rationale for each quadrant. | | 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | The Communication Requirements table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to [MIL-001] and [MIL-005]. | | 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | The conflict table has 3 conflicts (plain code against structure; nothing to install against `pandas`; author is reviewer), each with a mitigation. | | 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | The Business Goal Alignment table traces every concern to a numbered objective of [BC-001]. | | 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Primary concerns are in business language and mapped to FURPS+ attributes. | | 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | The rationale section explains each classification in plain language, per stakeholder. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of SA-001 are English. | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `..md`. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. | ## Overall Verdict Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 | --- [SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md