# RC-001: Review of BC-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-001 | | CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [BC-001] - Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | The Cost-Benefit section states that the assessment is qualitative on purpose (unpaid learning project, one participant), which is the explicit justification. | | 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | The Risks table has 9 risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. | | 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | 13 success criteria, each with a target and a measure (values such as `[12, 14, 15, 14, 21, 22, 24]`, 17.428..., 24, 53.6; exit codes; 0 warnings). | | 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate sections. | | 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 of [SA-001] and describes only their interest in the project. | | 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | The Methodological and Standards Foundation names the SQA/QC framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023, PEP 8, 257 and 484, and the dictionary. | | 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. | | 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | The Recommendation reads `Proceed` with a one-sentence rationale. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of BC-001 are English. | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `..md`. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. | ## Overall Verdict Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 | --- [BC-001]: ../../business-case.md [QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md