Add the planning baseline: business case, stakeholders, plan, dictionary, milestones and their reviews
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
# RC-001: Review of BC-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-001 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | The Cost-Benefit section states that the assessment is qualitative on purpose (unpaid learning project, one participant), which is the explicit justification. |
|
||||
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | The Risks table has 9 risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
|
||||
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | 13 success criteria, each with a target and a measure (values such as `[12, 14, 15, 14, 21, 22, 24]`, 17.428..., 24, 53.6; exit codes; 0 warnings). |
|
||||
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate sections. |
|
||||
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 of [SA-001] and describes only their interest in the project. |
|
||||
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | The Methodological and Standards Foundation names the SQA/QC framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023, PEP 8, 257 and 484, and the dictionary. |
|
||||
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
|
||||
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | The Recommendation reads `Proceed` with a one-sentence rationale. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of BC-001 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
||||
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
# RC-002: Review of SA-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-002 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have a Power level, an Interest level and a quadrant. |
|
||||
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and are the IDs used in [BC-001], [PP-001] and the milestones. |
|
||||
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | The summary table gives role, organization and the levels, with a rationale for each quadrant. |
|
||||
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | The Communication Requirements table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to [MIL-001] and [MIL-005]. |
|
||||
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | The conflict table has 3 conflicts (plain code against structure; nothing to install against `pandas`; author is reviewer), each with a mitigation. |
|
||||
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | The Business Goal Alignment table traces every concern to a numbered objective of [BC-001]. |
|
||||
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Primary concerns are in business language and mapped to FURPS+ attributes. |
|
||||
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | The rationale section explains each classification in plain language, per stakeholder. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of SA-001 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
|
||||
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
# RC-003: Review of DICT-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-003 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [DICT-001], [QC-DICT-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [DICT-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-DICT-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Every row has a PO term, its language, an IT term and a definition | Pass | All 18 rows have a PO term, `en`, an IT term and a definition. |
|
||||
| 2 | Each PO term maps to exactly one IT term and the reverse (no synonyms) | Pass | Each PO term has one IT term and the reverse; the library's two ways to read, and the hand-made average and `mean`, are separate PO terms (`read with csv`, `read with pandas`, `average`, `mean`). |
|
||||
| 3 | Every Domain Model concept has a row, and the Domain Model uses its PO term | N-A | No Domain Model exists in this project. |
|
||||
| 4 | The Operation Contracts, Sequence Diagrams, Design Class Diagrams and ERD use the IT term, not the PO term | N-A | No Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, Design Class Diagram or ERD exists in this project. |
|
||||
| 5 | Definitions are written in the PO language and are one sentence | Pass | Every definition is one sentence in English. |
|
||||
| 6 | "Used as PO term in" and "Used as IT term in" name artifact types that exist in the project | Pass | BC, SA, PP and MIL exist; PY is the source code that the milestones add. |
|
||||
| 7 | The dictionary's `Language` and `Domain` rows, and the language of every row, match the PO language and domain in the project registry | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it`, as the registry states; every row is `en`. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of DICT-001 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
[QC-DICT-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-dictionary.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# RC-004: Review of MIL-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-004 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The Deliverable section names the files and results evaluated; the tasks are rows in `## Tasks`. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has observable Go and No-Go cells (values, exit codes, warnings, HTTP status). |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | The Dependencies table names the milestone or plan that must be accepted and merged first. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | The Traceability table cites the objectives and Success Criteria numbers of [BC-001]. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (a stakeholder ID of [SA-001]). |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date 2026-10-15 is inside the plan window of [PP-001] (ends 2026-10-23) and the Business Case constraint. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-001 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-project-foundation.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# RC-005: Review of MIL-002
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-005 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-002], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-002]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The Deliverable section names the files and results evaluated; the tasks are rows in `## Tasks`. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has observable Go and No-Go cells (values, exit codes, warnings, HTTP status). |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | The Dependencies table names the milestone or plan that must be accepted and merged first. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | The Traceability table cites the objectives and Success Criteria numbers of [BC-001]. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (a stakeholder ID of [SA-001]). |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date 2026-10-17 is inside the plan window of [PP-001] (ends 2026-10-23) and the Business Case constraint. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-002 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-002]: ../../milestones/mil-002-read-with-csv.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# RC-006: Review of MIL-003
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-006 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-003], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-003]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The Deliverable section names the files and results evaluated; the tasks are rows in `## Tasks`. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has observable Go and No-Go cells (values, exit codes, warnings, HTTP status). |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | The Dependencies table names the milestone or plan that must be accepted and merged first. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | The Traceability table cites the objectives and Success Criteria numbers of [BC-001]. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (a stakeholder ID of [SA-001]). |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date 2026-10-19 is inside the plan window of [PP-001] (ends 2026-10-23) and the Business Case constraint. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-003 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-003]: ../../milestones/mil-003-pandas-analysis.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# RC-007: Review of MIL-004
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-007 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-004], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-004]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The Deliverable section names the files and results evaluated; the tasks are rows in `## Tasks`. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has observable Go and No-Go cells (values, exit codes, warnings, HTTP status). |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | The Dependencies table names the milestone or plan that must be accepted and merged first. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | The Traceability table cites the objectives and Success Criteria numbers of [BC-001]. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (a stakeholder ID of [SA-001]). |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date 2026-10-21 is inside the plan window of [PP-001] (ends 2026-10-23) and the Business Case constraint. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-004 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-004]: ../../milestones/mil-004-create-and-export.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# RC-008: Review of MIL-005
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-008 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [MIL-005], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-005]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the document)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The Deliverable section names the files and results evaluated; the tasks are rows in `## Tasks`. |
|
||||
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | The Go / No-Go table has observable Go and No-Go cells (values, exit codes, warnings, HTTP status). |
|
||||
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | The Dependencies table names the milestone or plan that must be accepted and merged first. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | The Traceability table cites the objectives and Success Criteria numbers of [BC-001]. |
|
||||
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (a stakeholder ID of [SA-001]). |
|
||||
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date 2026-10-23 is inside the plan window of [PP-001] (ends 2026-10-23) and the Business Case constraint. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-005 are English. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001] (CSV file, row, column, table, temperature, average, select, export); no synonym row exists. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CSV, SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is **not independent**: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-15 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[MIL-005]: ../../milestones/mil-005-screenshot-wiki-and-finish.md
|
||||
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user