4.4 KiB
4.4 KiB
RC-001 Review of BC-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-001 |
| CrossReference | BC-001, QC-BC-001, QC-LANG-001, DICT-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: BC-001
- Checklist used: QC-BC-001 and QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in reviewer reads English and the
itdomain) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer: AI as stand-in for S01)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified (Mandatory) | Pass | Cost-Benefit table is qualitative and the text justifies it: personal learning exercise with no revenue. |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation (Mandatory) | Pass | Risks table has five risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations (Mandatory) | Pass | Success Criteria table gives targets: 2473/392/103, 100 % tests pass, 0 runtime dependencies, 5 topics. |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope (Mandatory) | Pass | Scope has In Scope and Out of Scope subsections. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline (Mandatory) | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 from SA-001. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) (Optional) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework and ISO/IEC 25010:2023. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another (Mandatory) | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists. |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation (Mandatory) | Pass | Recommendation is a single "Proceed". |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder (Mandatory) |
Pass | Metadata has `Language |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list (Mandatory) |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language (Mandatory) | Pass | The Business Case is written in English throughout. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type (Mandatory) | Pass | Executive register: outcomes and risks, with file names only where needed. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms (Mandatory) | Pass | Terms census file, fur colour, colour count, summary and participant match DICT-001. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English (Mandatory) | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document (Mandatory) |
Pass | No translated twin exists in docs/. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again (Mandatory) | Pass | First version; no earlier accepted language. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly (Mandatory) | Pass | Reviewer reads English and knows the software domain; no second reviewer needed. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language (Optional) | Pass | Abbreviations are expanded on first use in the body (S-IDs and artifact IDs are framework labels). |
Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | - |