025-squirrel/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md

RC-002 Review of SA-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-002
CrossReference	SA-001, QC-SA-001, QC-LANG-001, DICT-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-13	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	f1b3c03

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: SA-001
• Checklist used: QC-SA-001 and QC-LANG-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: none (the stand-in reviewer reads English and the it domain)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer: AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries (Mandatory)	Pass	S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant.
2	Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts (Mandatory)	Pass	IDs S01-S03 are unique and used as owner/reviewer in other artifacts.
3	Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description (Mandatory)	Pass	Role, organization, Power and Interest levels are in the summary table.
4	Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones (Optional)	Pass	Communication Requirements table ties each stakeholder to MIL-001 to MIL-004.
5	Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies (Mandatory)	Pass	Two conflicts listed, each with a mitigation.
6	Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives (Mandatory)	Pass	Business Goal Alignment table cites BC-001 objectives.
7	Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) (Optional)	Pass	Concerns table maps each concern to a FURPS+ attribute.
8	Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry (Optional)	Pass	Short document in plain language.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder (Mandatory)	Pass	Metadata has `Language
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list (Mandatory)	Pass	en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language (Mandatory)	Pass	The Stakeholder Analysis is written in English throughout.
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type (Mandatory)	Pass	Professional register: quadrant rationale and FURPS+ mapping.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms (Mandatory)	Pass	Terms participant, census file and summary match DICT-001.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English (Mandatory)	Pass	Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document (Mandatory)	Pass	No translated twin exists in docs/.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again (Mandatory)	Pass	First version; no earlier accepted language.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly (Mandatory)	Pass	Reviewer reads English and knows the software domain; no second reviewer needed.
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language (Optional)	Pass	Abbreviations are expanded on first use in the body (S-IDs and artifact IDs are framework labels).

Overall Verdict

Go — all Mandatory criteria pass.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---