Add baseline: business case, stakeholders, plan, milestones, reviews
Mode: autonomous; reviews RC-001 to RC-007 are not independent.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
# RC-002 Review of SA-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-002 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in reviewer reads English and the `it` domain)
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer: AI as stand-in for S01)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries (Mandatory) | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
|
||||
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts (Mandatory) | Pass | IDs S01-S03 are unique and used as owner/reviewer in other artifacts. |
|
||||
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description (Mandatory) | Pass | Role, organization, Power and Interest levels are in the summary table. |
|
||||
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones (Optional) | Pass | Communication Requirements table ties each stakeholder to MIL-001 to MIL-004. |
|
||||
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies (Mandatory) | Pass | Two conflicts listed, each with a mitigation. |
|
||||
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives (Mandatory) | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table cites BC-001 objectives. |
|
||||
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) (Optional) | Pass | Concerns table maps each concern to a FURPS+ attribute. |
|
||||
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry (Optional) | Pass | Short document in plain language. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder (Mandatory) | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list (Mandatory) | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language (Mandatory) | Pass | The Stakeholder Analysis is written in English throughout. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type (Mandatory) | Pass | Professional register: quadrant rationale and FURPS+ mapping. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms (Mandatory) | Pass | Terms participant, census file and summary match [DICT-001]. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English (Mandatory) | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document (Mandatory) | Pass | No translated twin exists in `docs/`. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again (Mandatory) | Pass | First version; no earlier accepted language. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly (Mandatory) | Pass | Reviewer reads English and knows the software domain; no second reviewer needed. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language (Optional) | Pass | Abbreviations are expanded on first use in the body (S-IDs and artifact IDs are framework labels). |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| None | S01 | - |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
|
||||
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user