5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
RC-003: Review of DICT-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-003 |
| CrossReference | DICT-001, QC-DICT-001, QC-LANG-001, DICT-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: DICT-001
- Checklist used: QC-DICT-001 and, for the language and domain, QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the assistant also drafted the document)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Every row has a PO term, its language, an IT term and a definition | Pass | All 28 rows have a PO term, en, an IT term and a definition. |
| 2 | Each PO term maps to exactly one IT term and the reverse (no synonyms) | Pass | Each PO term has one IT term and the reverse; the Rules section forbids synonyms. |
| 3 | Every Domain Model concept has a row, and the Domain Model uses its PO term | N-A | No Domain Model exists in this project (Rules section). |
| 4 | The Operation Contracts, Sequence Diagrams, Design Class Diagrams and ERD use the IT term, not the PO term | N-A | No Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, Design Class Diagram or ERD exists in this project. |
| 5 | Definitions are written in the PO language and are one sentence | Pass | Every definition is one sentence in English. |
| 6 | "Used as PO term in" and "Used as IT term in" name artifact types that exist in the project | Pass | BC, SA, PP and MIL exist; PY is the source code, which the milestones will add. |
| 7 | The dictionary's Language and Domain rows, and the language of every row, match the PO language and domain in the project registry |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it, as the registry states; every row is en. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it in Metadata. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of DICT-001 are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names and commands appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The dictionary is the source of the PO terms; each PO term has one row and no synonym row. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | docs/ holds one file per artifact; there is no <name>.<language>.md. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against DICT-001; every term is one row of the dictionary itself. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is not independent: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
Challenge this Go in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted |
S01 | 2026-10-15 |