5.7 KiB
5.7 KiB
RC-002: Review of SA-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | SA-001, QC-SA-001, QC-LANG-001, DICT-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | e004c34 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: SA-001
- Checklist used: QC-SA-001 and, for the language and domain, QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the assistant also drafted the document)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant in the Summary Table; none is unclassified. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and are the IDs the other documents use. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role and organisation are stated and Power and Interest are HIGH or LOW with a rationale for each. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements maps each stakeholder to a channel, frequency, deliverable and milestone (MIL-001, MIL-005). |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Conflicting Interests table has three rows with a mitigation each, including the author-is-reviewer conflict. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to a Business Case objective by number. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concerns are in business language and mapped to FURPS+ attributes. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short, plain tables; each stakeholder can find their entry by ID. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it in Metadata. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of SA-001 are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names and commands appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of DICT-001: score, high score, reset, continuous play, data file, scoreboard, snake, segment, head, tail, food; game over appears only for the base's behaviour and as the removed game_over identifier, as the dictionary's rules allow. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | docs/ holds one file per artifact; there is no <name>.<language>.md. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against DICT-001; the concerns use the lectures' words. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is not independent: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
Challenge this Go in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted |
S01 | 2026-10-15 |