Plan the screenshot: objective 13 and MIL-006, reviewed in RC-014 to RC-017

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-13 14:56:39 +08:00
parent 02da40bc2e
commit 988ebba060
10 changed files with 386 additions and 16 deletions
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# RC-014: Review of BC-001 (screenshot)
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-014 |
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review. Objective 13, scope items, success criterion 14, two risks, an assumption and the cost changed, so a delta re-review is not allowed. Earlier record: [RC-001].
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the change)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost–Benefit Assessment is still qualitative and justified; the cost row now names two more days for the screenshot. |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Risks table has 13 rows, each with an Impact and a Mitigation; the two new rows cover the real-window capture and a screenshot that goes out of date. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria has 14 rows; row 14 states observable targets (the file, the text `Score: 5` followed by a high score, the README, three wiki pages, HTTP 200 with an image). |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` has the screenshot; `### Out of Scope` names a capture tool in the repository. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and states interests only; objective numbers are extended to 13. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation is unchanged. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | The new assumption is in Assumptions; Constraints are unchanged (window still ends 2026-10-25). |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is unchanged and unambiguous: "Proceed". |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of BC-001, including the new and changed text and the new Version History row, are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001], including the new row `screenshot`, which is the word of S01's request and names the one file `docs/images/snake-score-5.png`. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Language and domain are unchanged since the previous accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No new abbreviation is introduced; PNG and HTTP are standard names. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the change, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. S01 accepted the plan that contains this change in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-20 |
---
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# RC-015: Review of SA-001 (screenshot)
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-015 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review. A concern, a communication row and an alignment row were added. Earlier record: [RC-002].
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the change)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S03 are all classified; no row is added or changed. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unchanged and stable. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Power and Interest levels are unchanged and have a rationale. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements has the new row S03, README and wiki, Once, the screenshot, [MIL-006]. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Conflicting Interests table is unchanged and still has a mitigation for each row. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment has the new row S03 to [BC-001] objective 13. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | The new concern is in business language and mapped to the FURPS+ attribute Usability. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short, plain tables; the new rows are easy to find by ID. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of SA-001, including the new and changed text and the new Version History row, are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001], including the new row `screenshot`, which is the word of S01's request and names the one file `docs/images/snake-score-5.png`. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Language and domain are unchanged since the previous accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No new abbreviation is introduced; PNG and HTTP are standard names. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the change, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. S01 accepted the plan that contains this change in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-20 |
---
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
# RC-016: Review of DICT-001 (screenshot)
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-016 |
| CrossReference | [DICT-001], [QC-DICT-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [DICT-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-DICT-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review. One row was added. Earlier record: [RC-003].
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the change)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Every row has a PO term, its language, an IT term and a definition | Pass | All 29 rows have a PO term, `en`, an IT term and a definition; the new row `screenshot` is complete. |
| 2 | Each PO term maps to exactly one IT term and the reverse (no synonyms) | Pass | `screenshot` maps to one IT term, the file `docs/images/snake-score-5.png`, and no other row uses that file. |
| 3 | Every Domain Model concept has a row, and the Domain Model uses its PO term | N-A | No Domain Model exists in this project. |
| 4 | The Operation Contracts, Sequence Diagrams, Design Class Diagrams and ERD use the IT term, not the PO term | N-A | No Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, Design Class Diagram or ERD exists in this project. |
| 5 | Definitions are written in the PO language and are one sentence | Pass | The new definition is one sentence in English. |
| 6 | "Used as PO term in" and "Used as IT term in" name artifact types that exist in the project | Pass | BC, SA, PP and MIL exist; the IT column says `none` because no source code uses the term. |
| 7 | The dictionary's `Language` and `Domain` rows, and the language of every row, match the PO language and domain in the project registry | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it`; every row is `en`. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of DICT-001, including the new and changed text and the new Version History row, are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001], including the new row `screenshot`, which is the word of S01's request and names the one file `docs/images/snake-score-5.png`. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Language and domain are unchanged since the previous accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No new abbreviation is introduced; PNG and HTTP are standard names. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the change, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. S01 accepted the plan that contains this change in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-20 |
---
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
[QC-DICT-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-dictionary.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
+66
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
# RC-017: Review of MIL-006 (screenshot)
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-017 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-006], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-006]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review. First review of the milestone.
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the change)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names the file, the README picture and the three wiki pictures; 4 tasks are rows in `## Tasks`. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has 9 criteria, each with an observable Go and No-Go (PNG signature and size, text in the picture, links, HTTP 200, changed files). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table names [MIL-005] accepted and merged. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table cites [BC-001] objectives 13, 12 and 9 and the Success Criteria numbers. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date 2026-10-25 is inside the plan window of [PP-001] and the Business Case constraint. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-006, including the new and changed text and the new Version History row, are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001], including the new row `screenshot`, which is the word of S01's request and names the one file `docs/images/snake-score-5.png`. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Language and domain are unchanged since the previous accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No new abbreviation is introduced; PNG and HTTP are standard names. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the change, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. S01 accepted the plan that contains this change in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-20 |
---
[MIL-006]: ../../milestones/mil-006-screenshot.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md