Add planning baseline: business case, stakeholders, plan, milestones and reviews
Mount the SQA/QC framework and add BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, MIL-001 to MIL-008, review records RC-001 to RC-010 and the traceability matrix. Task: MIL-001#1 Task: MIL-001#2
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
# Review of BC-001
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-001 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001]
|
||||
- Also applied: [QC-LANG-001]
|
||||
- Scope: full review
|
||||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||||
- Language reviewer: none
|
||||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the author is S01)
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified (Mandatory) | Pass | Cost-Benefit table is qualitative and the text says why: a learning exercise with no budget. |
|
||||
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation (Mandatory) | Pass | Risks table has five rows, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
|
||||
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations (Mandatory) | Pass | Success Criteria table has seven rows, each with a target and a measure (pytest exit code, zero dependencies, file listing). |
|
||||
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope (Mandatory) | Pass | Scope has separate In Scope and Out of Scope subsections. |
|
||||
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline (Mandatory) | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 with their SA-001 IDs; roles are not re-described. |
|
||||
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) (Optional) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names object-oriented design, ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Doxygen and the framework. |
|
||||
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another (Mandatory) | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists; the two-week plan assumption was moved from Constraints to Assumptions during this review. |
|
||||
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation (Mandatory) | Pass | Recommendation is a single statement: Proceed. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder (Mandatory) | Pass | Metadata has Language = en and Domain = it, neither a placeholder. |
|
||||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list (Mandatory) | Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry domain list. |
|
||||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language (Mandatory) | Pass | All prose and table cells are English, the stated language. Code names stay as written. |
|
||||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type (Mandatory) | Pass | IT Executive English register: short sentences, decisions and outcomes first; implementation names appear only where a task needs them. |
|
||||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms (Mandatory) | Pass | No domain dictionary (DICT) exists in this project. Terms (car, player, level, finish line, milestone) are used with one word each, matching the assignment. Recorded as a stand-in decision. |
|
||||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English (Mandatory) | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document (Mandatory) | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document. |
|
||||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again (Mandatory) | Pass | First version; no language change since the previous accepted version. |
|
||||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly (Mandatory) | Pass | The reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain; stand-in for S01 (who is the PO and developer). No separate language reviewer. Open to challenge by S01. |
|
||||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language (Optional) | Pass | Abbreviations (SQA, QC, CI, RC, API, FURPS+) are spelled out on first use; stakeholder and document IDs are defined in SA-001. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go - every Mandatory criterion of QC-BC-001 and QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is not independent: author and reviewer are the same person, with the AI standing in for S01.
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Challenge this review in the end-of-run summary if the stand-in decisions on QC-LANG-001 criteria 5 and 9 are not accepted | S01 | 2026-10-27 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
||||
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
||||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user