Tirsvad
4b3391b226
Business case BC-001, stakeholder analysis SA-001, project plan PP-001, the four milestones MIL-001 to MIL-004, the domain dictionary DICT-001, the review records RC-001 to RC-013 and the traceability matrix. The reviews end in Go: the business case, stakeholder analysis, dictionary and the four milestones are Accepted. The project plan is still Proposed; it has no checklist and is accepted directly by the Product Owner.
6.9 KiB
6.9 KiB
Review Record: Stakeholder Analysis
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | SA-001, QC-SA-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: SA-001
- Checklist used: QC-SA-001 (
QC-SA-001, Stakeholder Analysis), together with QC-LANG-001 because the type is written in the PO language - Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: none (not confirmed at the time of this review; S01 confirmed it in RC-009)
- Status of this record: closed on 2026-10-07. The statuses and evidence are the assistant's assessment of the first version of the document; the criteria that failed were re-reviewed in RC-009, which ends in
Go.
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | Three stakeholders, each with Power, Interest and Quadrant. The levels of S02 and S03 are the author's classification, as the Purpose states; S01 confirms them (see the action items). |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 are unique and are the IDs used in BC-001 and in the milestones. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Each row has Role/Title, Organization and explicit HIGH or LOW levels, and the Rationale section is consistent with the table. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Optional. The Communication Requirements table gives channel, frequency, deliverable and the milestone (MIL-001 to MIL-004) for each stakeholder. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Three conflicts, each with stakeholders and a mitigation (function names against testability, no runtime dependencies against development tools, tokens against a public repository). |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | The Business Goal Alignment table traces eight concerns to objectives O1 to O7 of BC-001. The concern "tokens in .env stay private" has no objective of its own; it is traced to O6 and to the Risks table, a weak but honest link. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Optional. The concerns table gives each concern in business language and a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Optional. Short sections and tables in plain language; the abbreviations FURPS+ and RACI are not explained (see language criterion 10). |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has a Language row (en) and a Domain row (it); neither is a placeholder. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the domain list of docs/artifact-registry.md. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English. The author wrote it in English; the reviewer confirms by reading it. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives this type IT Professional English. Technical wording for a professional reader, as the registry intends. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Fail | No Domain Dictionary exists (docs/dictionary.md is absent), so the domain terms cannot be checked against one. N-A is not allowed for this criterion. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are English and unchanged from the template. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | One file per artifact: find docs -name '*.*.md' finds no translated twin. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Initial version: there is no earlier accepted version whose language could have changed. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Fail | Not yet confirmed. No record shows that the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain (there is no reviewer training record, TRR). S01 confirms on this record or names a language reviewer. N-A is not allowed for this criterion. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | Optional. Not spelled out on first use: FURPS+, RACI, README. |
Overall Verdict
Go-with-conditions — the criteria of the type's checklist pass, and the language checklist fails criteria 5 and 9 (and 10 where listed), which the review process turns into conditions. The conditions were closed and re-reviewed in RC-009, which ends in Go and covers the whole artifact.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
Condition: accept or change the reviewer assignment. S01 is the author of this artifact and also its reviewer, which framework/process/review-checklist-process.md does not allow. Either record the deviation as accepted (this is a single-person project) or name another reviewer. |
S01 | 2026-10-09 |
Condition (language criterion 5): decide how the domain terms are checked: draft DICT-001 (docs/dictionary.md) with the terms the documents use and review it against QC-DICT-001, or record an accepted deviation. |
S01 | 2026-10-09 |
| Condition (language criterion 9): confirm on this record that the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain, or name a language reviewer. | S01 | 2026-10-09 |
Condition: confirm the Power and Interest levels of S02 (LOW, HIGH) and S03 (LOW, LOW), and replace the Pending text under ## Sign-Off with the sign-off once the verdict is Go. |
S01 | 2026-10-09 |
| Optional (language criterion 10): spell out on first use: FURPS+, RACI, README. | S01 | 2026-10-09 |