2026-10-07 18:42:46 +02:00
2 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [76ac50e] |
+| 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Verdict recorded: Go-with-conditions | pending |

 ---

@@ -23,7 +24,7 @@
 - Language reviewer: none (n/a)
 - Method: a fresh clone of the branch into an empty folder, then the README's Windows PowerShell steps, run on 2026-10-08 on the author's Windows machine; the real command started from that clone; read-only calls to the Gitea and GitHub APIs for continuous integration, settings and pull requests.
 - Reviewer eligibility: S01 is the author and the reviewer; S01 accepted that deviation in chat on 2026-10-07 (see the traceability matrix).
- Status of this record: draft. The statuses and evidence are the assistant's, from the runs described above; they are not a decision.
+- Status of this record: decided on 2026-10-08 by S01, the reviewer, who recorded the verdict Go-with-conditions on the assistant's evidence. The statuses and evidence are the assistant's, from the runs described above.

 ## Checklist Results

@@ -39,9 +40,11 @@

 ## Overall Verdict

-Pending — a draft prepared for the reviewer (S01), who decides and replaces this line with the verdict. Proposed verdict: Go-with-conditions.
+Go-with-conditions — six of the seven success criteria of [BC-001] are met with evidence (1 to 4, 6 and 7). Criterion 5 is not met as the README is written, because its clone URL points at a GitHub repository that does not hold the code until the pull requests are merged and GitHub has them. S01 recorded this verdict on 2026-10-08.

-Rationale: six of the seven criteria are met with evidence (1 to 4, 6 and 7). Criterion 5 is not met as the README is written, because its clone URL points at a GitHub repository that does not hold the code until the pull requests are merged and GitHub has them. Nothing is broken in the project itself: the same steps work from the Gitea branch. Go / No-Go criterion 6 of [MIL-004] ("every criterion met") is therefore not yet met, and issue #28 stays open. No date moved, so the Project Plan needs no schedule change.
+The conditions are the first three action items below. Until they are closed, Go / No-Go criterion 6 of [MIL-004] ("every criterion met") is not met and issue #28 stays open. A new record that names this one re-checks the conditions and ends the matter with a `Go`. Nothing is broken in the project itself: the same README steps work from the Gitea branch. No date moved, so the Project Plan needs no schedule change.
+
+Reviewer eligibility: S01 is the author and the reviewer, which the review process does not allow; S01 accepted that deviation in chat on 2026-10-07 and it is recorded in the traceability matrix.

 ## Action Items

@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Added the rows for the code of each milestone, with [RC-014] to [RC-017] | [4d7cc33] |
 | 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Added the row for the check of the success criteria of [BC-001], with [RC-018] | [88aee40] |
+| 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Recorded the verdict Go-with-conditions of [RC-018] | pending |

 ---

@@ -36,14 +36,14 @@ updated whenever an artifact instance is created or reviewed.
 | Python source code of milestone 002 (`src/`, `tests/`, branch `mil-002-square-and-dashed-line`) | PY | - | - | [MIL-002] | - | [RC-015] (Go) |
 | Python source code of milestone 003 (`src/`, `tests/`, branch `mil-003-shapes-and-random-color`) | PY | - | - | [MIL-003] | - | [RC-016] (Go) |
 | Python source code of milestone 004 (`src/`, `tests/`, branch `mil-004-random-walk-and-spirograph`) | PY | - | - | [MIL-004] | - | [RC-017] (Go) |
-| Success criteria of [BC-001], checked against the delivered repository for the gate of [MIL-004] | BC | en | it | [BC-001], [MIL-004] | - | [RC-018] (draft, no verdict) |
+| Success criteria of [BC-001], checked against the delivered repository for the gate of [MIL-004] | BC | en | it | [BC-001], [MIL-004] | - | [RC-018] (Go-with-conditions) |

 ## Coverage Notes

 - `-` in Upstream means foundational ([SA-001] is the foundation of the stakeholder IDs); in Downstream it means nothing is built on it yet ([MIL-004] is the last gateway; the source code is listed per milestone in the `PY` rows); in Last Reviewed it means no `RC-*` exists.
 - [PP-001] has no `RC-*` because the Project Plan has no QC checklist; the Product Owner accepted it directly on 2026-10-08.
 - The `PY` rows list the Python code each milestone added or changed, reviewed against `QC-PY-001`. Their records, [RC-014] to [RC-017], ended in `Go` on 2026-10-08; a `-` in Language and Domain is right for source code, a technical type.
- [RC-018] checks the seven success criteria of [BC-001] against the delivered repository, as the evidence for the gate of [MIL-004]. It is a draft with the verdict `Pending` (proposed: Go-with-conditions, because criterion 5 is not met until the code is on `main` and on GitHub), so its row says `draft, no verdict`.
+- [RC-018] checks the seven success criteria of [BC-001] against the delivered repository, as the evidence for the gate of [MIL-004]. It ended in Go-with-conditions on 2026-10-08: criterion 5 is not met until the code is on `main` and on GitHub, and its first three action items are the conditions. A later record that names it re-checks them.
 - Each artifact lists its latest review record: the delta re-review ([RC-008] to [RC-013]) of the first review ([RC-001] to [RC-006]), or [RC-007] for [DICT-001]. All of them ended in `Go` on 2026-10-07.
 - S01 is the author and also the reviewer of every artifact. The review process does not allow this; S01 accepted the deviation in chat on 2026-10-07 because the project has one person and no governance document (`GOV`) exists.
 - No instance exists yet for the types KPI, RA, BMC, BPMN, UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, ERD, ADR, GOV or TRR. One of them matters for the open reviews: GOV (the rule that the reviewer is not the author).
@@ -76,5 +76,4 @@ updated whenever an artifact instance is created or reviewed.
 [RC-016]: ./reviews/rc-016-code-mil-003.md
 [RC-017]: ./reviews/rc-017-code-mil-004.md
 [RC-018]: ./reviews/rc-018-business-case-success-criteria.md
-[4d7cc33]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/018-turtle/commit/4d7cc33cac2c090c663409abb1e7ab0a34d871f5
 [88aee40]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/018-turtle/commit/88aee4051d3fd7a915bc793c157e421f607e3034