The README's "Continuous integration" section and its project layout still described the workflow as it was before #35: they named .github/workflows/ci.yml, said it is read by GitHub Actions and Gitea Actions, and said CI runs the Doxygen build. The workflow is now .gitea/workflows/ci.yml, it runs on Gitea Actions, and it has no Doxygen step. RC-018 and RC-019 both noted the mismatch.
Change
Only README.md:
The section names .gitea/workflows/ci.yml, says it runs on every push and every pull request, and lists what it runs: pytest, ruff (lint and format check) and mypy after setting up Python 3.13 and installing the project with its development tools.
It says plainly that CI does not build the source documentation and points to doxygen Doxyfile in the next section.
A second paragraph says why the file is under .gitea/workflows: GitHub does not run it, and pushing to the GitHub mirror needs no workflow permission.
The project layout line is .gitea/workflows/ci.yml.
Everything else in the README is unchanged, including "Run the tests", whose "same checks as in continuous integration" is still correct.
Verification
The old path and the old claims appear nowhere else in the README.
The README is the Doxygen main page, so the documentation was rebuilt: doxygen Doxyfile prints no warning.
pytest still passes (95 tests). No code, no workflow and no other document changes.
CI runs on this pull request.
Not changed
Older documents still mention the old path or CI building the documentation: the Business Case scope, MIL-001 task 5 and RC-018. They are Accepted or historical records and are left as they are.
Issues
No issue closed: this pull request corrects documentation, and every issue of the project is already closed.
## Correct the README Continuous integration section
The README's "Continuous integration" section and its project layout still described the workflow as it was before #35: they named `.github/workflows/ci.yml`, said it is read by GitHub Actions and Gitea Actions, and said CI runs the Doxygen build. The workflow is now `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`, it runs on Gitea Actions, and it has no Doxygen step. `RC-018` and `RC-019` both noted the mismatch.
### Change
Only `README.md`:
- The section names `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`, says it runs on every push and every pull request, and lists what it runs: pytest, ruff (lint and format check) and mypy after setting up Python 3.13 and installing the project with its development tools.
- It says plainly that CI does not build the source documentation and points to `doxygen Doxyfile` in the next section.
- A second paragraph says why the file is under `.gitea/workflows`: GitHub does not run it, and pushing to the GitHub mirror needs no workflow permission.
- The project layout line is `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`.
Everything else in the README is unchanged, including "Run the tests", whose "same checks as in continuous integration" is still correct.
### Verification
- The old path and the old claims appear nowhere else in the README.
- The README is the Doxygen main page, so the documentation was rebuilt: `doxygen Doxyfile` prints no warning.
- `pytest` still passes (95 tests). No code, no workflow and no other document changes.
- CI runs on this pull request.
### Not changed
Older documents still mention the old path or CI building the documentation: the Business Case scope, `MIL-001` task 5 and `RC-018`. They are Accepted or historical records and are left as they are.
### Issues
No issue closed: this pull request corrects documentation, and every issue of the project is already closed.
The section and the project layout still named .github/workflows/ci.yml and said CI
builds the documentation. The workflow is .gitea/workflows/ci.yml, runs on Gitea
Actions, and runs pytest, ruff and mypy; it has no Doxygen step, so the README now
points to doxygen Doxyfile and says why the file is not under .github/workflows.
Tirsvad
merged commit f3a7d8f77b into main2026-10-07 19:35:12 +02:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Correct the README Continuous integration section
The README's "Continuous integration" section and its project layout still described the workflow as it was before #35: they named
.github/workflows/ci.yml, said it is read by GitHub Actions and Gitea Actions, and said CI runs the Doxygen build. The workflow is now.gitea/workflows/ci.yml, it runs on Gitea Actions, and it has no Doxygen step.RC-018andRC-019both noted the mismatch.Change
Only
README.md:.gitea/workflows/ci.yml, says it runs on every push and every pull request, and lists what it runs: pytest, ruff (lint and format check) and mypy after setting up Python 3.13 and installing the project with its development tools.doxygen Doxyfilein the next section..gitea/workflows: GitHub does not run it, and pushing to the GitHub mirror needs no workflow permission..gitea/workflows/ci.yml.Everything else in the README is unchanged, including "Run the tests", whose "same checks as in continuous integration" is still correct.
Verification
doxygen Doxyfileprints no warning.pyteststill passes (95 tests). No code, no workflow and no other document changes.Not changed
Older documents still mention the old path or CI building the documentation: the Business Case scope,
MIL-001task 5 andRC-018. They are Accepted or historical records and are left as they are.Issues
No issue closed: this pull request corrects documentation, and every issue of the project is already closed.