A new row for the check of the success criteria of BC-001 against the delivered
repository, for the gate of MIL-004. Its record RC-018 is a draft with the verdict
Pending, so the row says draft, no verdict.
Refs #28
RC-018 checks the seven success criteria of BC-001 against the delivered repository
with a fresh clone, the README steps under PowerShell, the real command, the host's
CI runs and settings, and the pull requests. Criteria 1 to 4, 6 and 7 are met.
Criterion 5 is not met as written yet: the README clones the GitHub repository,
which holds only the initial commit until the pull requests are merged. The proposed
verdict is Go-with-conditions and S01 decides.
Refs #28
The Reviews open issue now records the code reviews of the four milestones against
QC-PY-001 (RC-014 to RC-017, all Go). S01, the Product Owner, accepted the new
version on 2026-10-08, so the Version History gets a new Accepted row and the
previous one becomes Deprecated.
RC-014 to RC-017 review the Python code each milestone added or changed and all
four end in Go. S01 accepted the imports inside create_window and create_pen as a
documented exception, the name tim, N-A for criterion 10 (the project has no
design class diagram) and the lower-bounded development tools. The traceability
matrix lists the code of each milestone.
Closes#8Closes#15Closes#22Closes#29
S01, the Product Owner, accepted PP-001 on 2026-10-08: the Version History gets
a new Accepted row and the Reviews open issue says so. The Gateway Schedule now
links the four milestones that were created on the Gitea host (issues #1 to #29).
Business case BC-001, stakeholder analysis SA-001, project plan PP-001, the four
milestones MIL-001 to MIL-004, the domain dictionary DICT-001, the review records
RC-001 to RC-013 and the traceability matrix.
The reviews end in Go: the business case, stakeholder analysis, dictionary and the
four milestones are Accepted. The project plan is still Proposed; it has no
checklist and is accepted directly by the Product Owner.
Tirsvad