Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/018-turtle
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Record the verdict Go-with-conditions on RC-018

Browse Source 
S01 decided the check of the Business Case success criteria on 2026-10-08. Six of the
seven criteria are met; criterion 5 is not met until the code is on main and on
GitHub, so the first three action items of RC-018 are the conditions. The
traceability matrix row follows the verdict.

Refs #28
This commit is contained in:
Tirsvad
2026-10-08 00:41:15 +08:00
parent 4cb75dff77
commit 54f60a951a
2 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-018-business-case-success-criteria.md
+6 -3
View File
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [76ac50e] |
| 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Verdict recorded: Go-with-conditions | pending |
---
@@ -23,7 +24,7 @@
- Language reviewer: none (n/a)
- Method: a fresh clone of the branch into an empty folder, then the README's Windows PowerShell steps, run on 2026-10-08 on the author's Windows machine; the real command started from that clone; read-only calls to the Gitea and GitHub APIs for continuous integration, settings and pull requests.
- Reviewer eligibility: S01 is the author and the reviewer; S01 accepted that deviation in chat on 2026-10-07 (see the traceability matrix).
- Status of this record: draft. The statuses and evidence are the assistant's, from the runs described above; they are not a decision.
- Status of this record: decided on 2026-10-08 by S01, the reviewer, who recorded the verdict Go-with-conditions on the assistant's evidence. The statuses and evidence are the assistant's, from the runs described above.
## Checklist Results
@@ -39,9 +40,11 @@
## Overall Verdict
Pending — a draft prepared for the reviewer (S01), who decides and replaces this line with the verdict. Proposed verdict: Go-with-conditions.
Go-with-conditions — six of the seven success criteria of [BC-001] are met with evidence (1 to 4, 6 and 7). Criterion 5 is not met as the README is written, because its clone URL points at a GitHub repository that does not hold the code until the pull requests are merged and GitHub has them. S01 recorded this verdict on 2026-10-08.
Rationale: six of the seven criteria are met with evidence (1 to 4, 6 and 7). Criterion 5 is not met as the README is written, because its clone URL points at a GitHub repository that does not hold the code until the pull requests are merged and GitHub has them. Nothing is broken in the project itself: the same steps work from the Gitea branch. Go / No-Go criterion 6 of [MIL-004] ("every criterion met") is therefore not yet met, and issue #28 stays open. No date moved, so the Project Plan needs no schedule change.
The conditions are the first three action items below. Until they are closed, Go / No-Go criterion 6 of [MIL-004] ("every criterion met") is not met and issue #28 stays open. A new record that names this one re-checks the conditions and ends the matter with a `Go`. Nothing is broken in the project itself: the same README steps work from the Gitea branch. No date moved, so the Project Plan needs no schedule change.
Reviewer eligibility: S01 is the author and the reviewer, which the review process does not allow; S01 accepted that deviation in chat on 2026-10-07 and it is recorded in the traceability matrix.
## Action Items