# Stakeholder Analysis ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | SA-001 | | CrossReference | [BC-001] | | Language | en | | Domain | it | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-07 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c55db0e] | | 2026-10-07 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Re-review fix: spell out FURPS+ | pending | --- ## Purpose Identify who is affected by the project and what each needs, using a power/interest grid, so the plan and the README serve them. ## Stakeholder Summary Table | ID | Name | Role/Title | Organization | Power Level | Interest Level | Quadrant | Primary Concern (Business Language) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | S01 | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | Course participant: Product Owner, developer and reviewer | Tirsvad | HIGH | HIGH | Manage Closely | A finished, reviewed assignment that follows the framework | | S02 | Udemy coursists | Fellow course participants | Udemy community | LOW | HIGH | Keep Informed | Readable, runnable code with the assignment's function names, and README run instructions | | S03 | GitHub viewers | Repository browsers | Public | LOW | LOW | Monitor | A clear repository description, topics and README, and no runtime dependencies beyond the lesson's | ## Power/Interest Classification Rationale - **Manage Closely:** S01 decides scope, writes and reviews everything. - **Keep Informed:** S02 cannot change the project but depends on its code and README. - **Monitor:** S03 browses for ideas and has no say; the description, topics and README are enough. ## Primary Concerns and FURPS+ Mapping FURPS+ stands for functionality, usability, reliability, performance and supportability, plus design, implementation, interface and physical constraints. | ID | Concern | FURPS+ attribute | | --- | --- | --- | | S01 | Work follows the plan-first process and is verified by tests | Functionality, Supportability | | S02 | Code is readable and runs with the documented steps | Usability, Functionality | | S03 | Repository is self-explanatory and light | Usability, Implementation (no extra runtime dependencies) | ## Communication Requirements | ID | Channel | Frequency | Deliverable | Phase / Milestone | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | S01 | Chat review of the working tree | Per phase | Reviewed documents and code | All | | S02 | README | Once, on publication | Run and test instructions | Delivery | | S03 | Repository page | Once, on publication | Description, topics, README | Delivery | ## Conflicting Interests and Mitigations | Conflict | Stakeholders | Mitigation | | --- | --- | --- | | S02 wants the assignment's exact function names; S03 wants a tidy, idiomatic project | S02, S03 | Keep the assignment's names for public functions and apply the conventions everywhere else | ## Traceability Analysis ### Business Goal Alignment | Stakeholder | Concern | Business Case objective | | --- | --- | --- | | S01 | Reviewed, framework-compliant work | [BC-001] O3, O4 | | S02 | Runnable code and instructions | [BC-001] O1, O2 | | S03 | Clear repository presentation | [BC-001] O4 | ## Sign-Off Accepted by S01 (RC-002). --- [BC-001]: ./business-case.md [c55db0e]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/016-pretty_table/commit/c55db0e0f2f7c259018b85a90824b124cc0b780d