# SQA Review Record ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-005 | | CrossReference | [BC-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-07 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [cd85bb4] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [BC-001] - Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] (`qc-business-case.md`) and [QC-LANG-001] (`qc-language-domain.md`) - Scope: full review. It replaces [RC-001], which was written when the checklists were not available in `framework/qc/`. Defects found were fixed first, so the version reviewed is the one with the new Version History row. - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or explicitly justified when qualitative | Pass | The first review passed this without a justification. The version under review adds one under the Cost–Benefit table: the only cost is the participant's time and there is no revenue | | 2 | Risks have documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Three risks, each with impact and mitigation | | 3 | Success criteria are measurable | Pass | Four criteria with explicit targets and measures (exit code, 100% tests pass, at least 3 topics) | | 4 | Scope separates In Scope from Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` | | 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to SA IDs | Pass | S01, S02, S03 cited by ID from [SA-001] | | 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated | Pass | The framework process and ISO/IEC 25010:2023 | | 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and distinct | Pass | Two separate sections; the one-week delivery constraint was added in this review | | 8 | Clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | `Proceed` with a one-sentence rationale | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, neither a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry's domain list | | 3 | The content is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the type | Pass | IT Executive English: Plain executive English; no unexplained jargon | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The project has no dictionary (`DICT`), so there are no PO terms to contradict; terms are used consistently (for example PrettyTable, virtual environment, test) | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked in the file | | 7 | No translated twin exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` has one file per artifact | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | Language and domain are unchanged since the first version | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain and the language has confirmed the domain terms | Pass | S01 reads English and works in the IT domain; the language reviewer is `none` | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use | Pass | PyPI, SQA and QC are spelled out on first use (fixed in this review) | ## Overall Verdict Go — every mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes. Two defects were fixed before the verdict: the qualitative cost-benefit lacked a justification (criterion 1) and the document had no delivery-time constraint, which the milestone cross-check needs; PyPI, SQA and QC were not spelled out (QC-LANG-001 criterion 10). The author and the reviewer are both S01, the only stakeholder, as in the first reviews. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None open | S01 | n/a | --- [BC-001]: ../../business-case.md [QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-business-case.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-language-domain.md [cd85bb4]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/016-pretty_table/commit/cd85bb42593077fc462fae258e9336f4ddd34985