Re-review RC-001 to RC-003 against the framework checklists
Fix the defects found (cost-benefit justification, delivery-time constraint, spelled-out abbreviations) and add review records RC-005 to RC-007 for the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis and milestone MIL-001, all with verdict Go.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-07 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c55db0e] |
|
||||
| 2026-10-07 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c55db0e] |
|
||||
| 2026-10-07 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Re-review fix: spell out FURPS+ | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,6 +36,8 @@ Identify who is affected by the project and what each needs, using a power/inter
|
||||
|
||||
## Primary Concerns and FURPS+ Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
FURPS+ stands for functionality, usability, reliability, performance and supportability, plus design, implementation, interface and physical constraints.
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Concern | FURPS+ attribute |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| S01 | Work follows the plan-first process and is verified by tests | Functionality, Supportability |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user