Re-review RC-001 to RC-003 against the framework checklists

Fix the defects found (cost-benefit justification, delivery-time constraint, spelled-out abbreviations) and add review records RC-005 to RC-007 for the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis and milestone MIL-001, all with verdict Go.
2026-10-07 13:10:17 +08:00
parent 7fa2fcacb6
commit cd85bb4259
7 changed files with 212 additions and 8 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# SQA Review Record
+
+## Metadata
+| Key | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| ID | RC-007 |
+| CrossReference | [MIL-001] |
+
+## Version History
+| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 2026-10-07 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
+
+---
+
+## Artifact Under Review
+
+- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
+- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] (`qc-milestones-gateways.md`) and [QC-LANG-001] (`qc-language-domain.md`)
+- Scope: full review. It replaces [RC-003], which was written when the checklists were not available in `framework/qc/`. Defects found were fixed first, so the version reviewed is the one with the new Version History row.
+- Language and domain: en / it
+- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain)
+
+## Checklist Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The project, tests, config and repository metadata, not just a date |
+| 2 | Explicit, objectively checkable Go/No-Go criteria | Pass | Six criteria, each with a Go and a No-Go condition that a command or page shows |
+| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are mapped | Pass | The table lists [BC-001] and [SA-001]; there is no earlier milestone |
+| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table maps O1 to O4 to tasks |
+| 5 | Owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Both are S01 |
+| 6 | Target date is consistent with project constraints | Pass | The first review passed this, but [BC-001] had no delivery-time constraint to check against. [BC-001] now states one week (2026-10-07 to 2026-10-14) and the target date matches |
+
+## Language and Domain Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, neither a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` |
+| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry's domain list |
+| 3 | The content is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English |
+| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the type | Pass | IT Executive English: Plain executive English |
+| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The project has no dictionary (`DICT`), so there are no PO terms to contradict; terms are used consistently (for example PrettyTable, virtual environment, test) |
+| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked in the file |
+| 7 | No translated twin exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` has one file per artifact |
+| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | Language and domain are unchanged since the first version |
+| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain and the language has confirmed the domain terms | Pass | S01 reads English and works in the IT domain; the language reviewer is `none` |
+| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use | Pass | RC is spelled out as the review record in Go criterion 6 (fixed in this review) |
+
+## Overall Verdict
+
+Go — every mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes. One defect was fixed before the verdict: the target date had no Business Case constraint to be consistent with (criterion 6), and the review record was cited as `RC` without explanation (QC-LANG-001 criterion 10). The author and the reviewer are both S01, the only stakeholder, as in the first reviews.
+
+## Action Items
+
+| Action | Owner | Due |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| None open | S01 | n/a |
+
+---
+
+[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-pretty-table-project.md
+[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
+[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-language-domain.md