Add Pretty Table project: plan, accepted documents and code
Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan and milestone MIL-001 with review records RC-001 to RC-003, then the Python project: PrettyTable Pokemon table, constants, pytest tests, pyproject.toml, Doxyfile, CI workflow and README. Task: MIL-001#1 Task: MIL-001#2 Task: MIL-001#3 Task: MIL-001#4 Task: MIL-001#5 Task: MIL-001#6 Task: MIL-001#7 Task: MIL-001#8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
# Business Model Canvas (BMC)
|
||||
|
||||
Cite in `CrossReference` only if the instance exists (`new-artifact.sh` checks this for you):
|
||||
|
||||
- **BC** — Objectives the canvas operationalizes; cost/revenue must agree with its Cost–Benefit Assessment
|
||||
- **SA** — Value Propositions, Customer Segments, Channels — cite S-IDs
|
||||
- **BPMN** — Key Activities — cite the process that realizes them
|
||||
- **KPI** — Measures of value proposition / revenue — cite KPI IDs
|
||||
|
||||
## Required sections (after Metadata / Version History)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Purpose / Scope** — one paragraph.
|
||||
2. **Canvas** — all 9 building blocks populated, none empty: Key Partners,
|
||||
Key Activities, Key Resources, Value Propositions, Customer
|
||||
Relationships, Channels, Customer Segments, Cost Structure, Revenue
|
||||
Streams. Must stay reviewable as a single, concise overview.
|
||||
3. **Assumptions** — explicit and testable (how would we know it is wrong?).
|
||||
4. **Consistency Check** — Revenue Streams vs Cost Structure agree;
|
||||
Segments/Channels match stakeholder groups from `SA`.
|
||||
|
||||
Cite Business Case objectives (`[BC-001]`) instead of restating them.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user