Add Pretty Table project: plan, accepted documents and code
Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan and milestone MIL-001 with review records RC-001 to RC-003, then the Python project: PrettyTable Pokemon table, constants, pytest tests, pyproject.toml, Doxyfile, CI workflow and README. Task: MIL-001#1 Task: MIL-001#2 Task: MIL-001#3 Task: MIL-001#4 Task: MIL-001#5 Task: MIL-001#6 Task: MIL-001#7 Task: MIL-001#8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
# Reviewer Training (TRN)
|
||||
|
||||
The reusable training material for reviewers. It mitigates the "resistance to
|
||||
standardized reviews" risk of the Business Case. Framework-level, like `PRC`:
|
||||
no project data, no stakeholder IDs, no links to project artifacts. The
|
||||
*record* that a session happened (date, attendees, result) is a project
|
||||
document, written after the session.
|
||||
|
||||
- **File:** `framework/process/reviewer-training.md` (singleton, version `001`).
|
||||
- **Create:** `new-artifact.sh TRN`.
|
||||
- **CrossReference:** `PRC` (the procedure the training teaches).
|
||||
|
||||
## Required sections (after Metadata / Version History)
|
||||
|
||||
Purpose, Audience and Prerequisites, Learning Objectives, Agenda (modules with
|
||||
minutes), Module Notes, Exercises (each with input and expected result),
|
||||
Assessment (how and pass criteria), Session Record (what to capture).
|
||||
Exercises use a seeded, generic example, not a real project artifact.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user