# RC-002 Stakeholder Analysis Review

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001] (docs/stakeholder-analysis.md)
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] (`QC-SA-001`)
- Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S03 each have power, interest and quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are used by every other document. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Levels are stated as High/Low in the table, with organisation and role. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps each stakeholder to MIL-001 to MIL-003. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (assignment names vs testable structure) with a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability table maps each stakeholder to [BC-001] objectives. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain language, short; each stakeholder can find their own row. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — all criteria pass. The Sign-Off row said `Pending review` and was updated to the Go in SA-001 v2.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Record the sign-off in SA-001 (done in v2) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |

---

[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d