github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-035-ucd-001.md

Review Record: UCD-001 (quality checks)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-035
CrossReference	UCD-001, QC-UCD-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-10	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	385d2fb

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: UCD-001
• Checklist used: QC-UCD-001

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Actors are defined with correct UML stereotypes (e.g. <<System>>, <<Actor>>)	Pass	Software Engineer is <<Actor>>, like the others.
2	System boundary is clearly drawn and labeled	Pass	Unchanged.
3	Include/extend relationships are used correctly per UML 2.5.1, not as generic "uses" arrows	Pass	Unchanged; the new use case has none.
4	Every actor participates in at least one use case (no orphan actors)	Pass	Software Engineer reaches Run Project Quality Checks.
5	Diagram is traceable to a documented stakeholder need	Pass	S02 in the Actor Table.
6	Use case names are verb phrases describing actor goals, not internal system operations	Pass	"Run Project Quality Checks".
7	Diagram is free of implementation detail (e.g. UI widgets, database tables)	Pass	No tool or file named.
8	Actor and use case naming is consistent with corresponding Use Case and User Story documents	Pass	Checked mechanically: UC-005's title and the story role match.

Overall Verdict

Go - all eight criteria pass for the amendment (the actor and use case of UC-005). S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

---