Files

T

Tirsvad a2bf2d4204 Write and accept the brief use cases for the P1 candidates

Add the use case diagram UCD-001, the user stories US-001 and the brief use
cases UC-001 to UC-004 (Synchronize Repository Metadata, Configure Workflow
Credentials, Onboard a Repository, Diagnose a Failed Workflow). Review and
accept them (RC-019 to RC-024) and the PP-001 row that records them
(RC-025), and update TM-001 and the registry.

Task: MIL-002#1

2026-10-10 13:04:30 +08:00

2.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

Review Record: UC-003

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-023
CrossReference	UC-003, QC-UC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-10	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	pending

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: UC-003
Checklist used: QC-UC-001 (Brief format)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario	Pass	Finding fixed during this review: the paragraph also described the defect alternative; it now summarizes only the main success scenario (see US-001.06).
2	Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure	N-A	Format is Brief.
3	All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows	N-A	Format is Brief; the sections of a Brief use case are present (actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions, paragraph).
4	Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined	Pass	Both stated.
5	Primary actor is explicitly stated	Pass	DevOps Professional.
6	Stakeholders and their interests are stated	Pass	S-IDs from SA-001 with an interest each.
7	Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps	N-A	Format is Brief: one paragraph.
8	Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1	N-A	No alternative flows in a Brief use case; the relationships are in UCD-001.
9	Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text	N-A	No steps in a Brief use case.
10	Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories	Pass	Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001 exactly.
11	Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated	Pass	Scope and user-goal level stated.
12	Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail	Pass	Goal wording; the guides and secrets are named, no UI.

Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass; the one finding (criterion 1) was fixed during the review. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

2.7 KiB Raw Blame History