github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-070-us-001-metrics.md

Review Record: US-001 (stories US-001.18 to US-001.20)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-070
CrossReference	US-001, QC-US-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-14	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version; accepted	9ca9673

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: US-001
• Checklist used: QC-US-001
• Scope: delta re-review of the added stories US-001.18 to US-001.20 and the Purpose and Scope and INVEST sections; earlier record RC-057 (US-001.01 to US-001.17 unchanged)
• Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
• Language reviewer: none
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the user accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-14)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Follows INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable)	Pass	US-001.18 to US-001.20 are independent of each other, each states one value and has checkable criteria; the INVEST section of US-001 now counts twenty stories.
2	Written in "As a / I want / So that" form	Pass	All three stories.
3	Clear, testable acceptance criteria are included	Pass	Each has Given/When/Then criteria with a pass and a fail case (a missing report, no files, unchanged numbers).
4	Traceable to a use case or epic	Pass	Each traces to [UC-008] and [MIL-010].
5	Story is sized to fit within a single iteration	Pass	Each says: fits one iteration.
6	Story statement avoids technical implementation detail	Pass	The statements name badges, files, lines and coverage; format and branch names are left to the contract.
7	Role named in the story matches an actor defined in the Use Case Diagram	Pass	Software Engineer, an actor of UCD-001.

Overall Verdict

Go - all criteria pass. The AI records the decision as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

---