github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-069-uc-008.md

Review Record: UC-008 (Show Code Metrics and Coverage Badges)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-069
CrossReference	UC-008, QC-UC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-14	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version; accepted	9ca9673

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: UC-008
• Checklist used: QC-UC-001
• Scope: full review (Brief format; MIL-010 task 1)
• Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
• Language reviewer: none
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the user accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-14)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario	Pass	One paragraph: push, count, read the report, publish three badges, README shows them.
2	Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure	N-A	Format is Brief.
3	All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows	N-A	Format is Brief; actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions and the paragraph are present.
4	Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined	Pass	Both are stated; the postcondition says that only the badges change.
5	Primary actor is explicitly stated	Pass	Software Engineer.
6	Stakeholders and their interests are stated	Pass	S02 and S05 with an interest each.
7	Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps	N-A	Format is Brief.
8	Alternative/exception flows correctly reference <<include>>/<<extend>> use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1	N-A	None in a Brief.
9	Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text	N-A	No steps in a Brief.
10	Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories	Pass	Title and actor equal UCD-001 (RC-071); the Stories line lists US-001.18 to US-001.20, which exist (RC-070).
11	Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated	Pass	Scope Reusable Workflow Collection, user-goal level.
12	Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail	Pass	Goal wording; no tool, file name or format of a report is named.

Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass. The AI records the decision as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

---