Files
github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-035-ucd-001.md
T
Tirsvad 385d2fb7cb Define and accept the contract of the shared quality-check workflow
Add the brief use case UC-005 (Run Project Quality Checks), the actor and
use case in UCD-001, stories US-001.09 and US-001.10, and ADR-0005 with the
inputs, the pinned tools and what a pass and a fail mean, based on a probe
of the runner image. Review and accept them (RC-035 to RC-038) and update
TM-001 and the registry.

Task: MIL-003#2
2026-10-10 16:06:30 +08:00

1.9 KiB

Review Record: UCD-001 (quality checks)

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-035
CrossReference UCD-001, QC-UCD-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-10 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S01 Initial version pending

Artifact Under Review

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Actors are defined with correct UML stereotypes (e.g. <<System>>, <<Actor>>) Pass Software Engineer is <<Actor>>, like the others.
2 System boundary is clearly drawn and labeled Pass Unchanged.
3 Include/extend relationships are used correctly per UML 2.5.1, not as generic "uses" arrows Pass Unchanged; the new use case has none.
4 Every actor participates in at least one use case (no orphan actors) Pass Software Engineer reaches Run Project Quality Checks.
5 Diagram is traceable to a documented stakeholder need Pass S02 in the Actor Table.
6 Use case names are verb phrases describing actor goals, not internal system operations Pass "Run Project Quality Checks".
7 Diagram is free of implementation detail (e.g. UI widgets, database tables) Pass No tool or file named.
8 Actor and use case naming is consistent with corresponding Use Case and User Story documents Pass Checked mechanically: UC-005's title and the story role match.

Overall Verdict

Go - all eight criteria pass for the amendment (the actor and use case of UC-005). S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None - -