# Review Record: SA-001 Stakeholder Analysis

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-004 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-10 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | [aa3f088] |
| 2026-10-10 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | S01 stood in for S05<br>Independence of the review is still open | [0799b43] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S05 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S05 are used by BC-001, PP-001 and the milestones. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization and HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels per stakeholder, with a rationale section. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements table maps each stakeholder to a milestone. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Four conflicts, each with stakeholders and a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment maps each concern to O1 to O4 of BC-001. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Primary Concern column plus a FURPS+ mapping table. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain-language summary table and one section per topic. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — all eight criteria pass, with two follow-ups that do not affect the criteria. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been `Accepted` since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); the S05 stand-in review is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too; independence is still open.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Update the Sign-Off section, which still says 'Pending review by S01 and S05', with a Version History row | S01 | 2026-10-17 |
| Identify the holders of the S03 role (listed as 'holders to be confirmed') | S01 | 2026-10-17 |

---

[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[aa3f088]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/aa3f08876d55fa5f008e93f65176a496601c00ca
[0799b43]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/0799b43888a1fef02fe135818a4a38eff3452a09