# Review Record: ADR-0009 Wiki publishing as a reusable workflow

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-063 |
| CrossReference | [ADR-0009], [QC-ADR-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [ADR-0009]
- Checklist used: [QC-ADR-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Mode: supervised (the AI prepared the record; S01, the user, gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-13)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The ID (`ADR-NNNN`, 4-digit) matches the filename number and is unique and sequential | Pass | ADR-0009 in `adr-0009-wiki-publishing-reusable-workflow.md`; follows ADR-0008. |
| 2 | Context states the problem, the forces (cost, risk, constraints) and the options evaluated | Pass | Names the scoped delivery, its gate, the fixed trigger path and version, and the new folder rule. |
| 3 | At least two options were considered, or the absence of alternatives is justified | Pass | Two options: keep the scoped workflow and read both folders, or a reusable workflow. |
| 4 | Decision is stated in one or two unhedged sentences and matches one of the evaluated options | Pass | Two sentences; matches option 2. The rules below it add detail only. |
| 5 | Consequences list both Positive and Negative outcomes | Pass | Finding fixed during this review: the consequence "passing a declared secret is not yet verified" was out of date, because run 316 verified it on 2026-10-13. It now says so. Four positive and four negative outcomes. |
| 6 | Quality-attribute impacts (performance, security, portability, etc.) are named where the decision affects them | Pass | Finding fixed during this review: the security impact was implicit. A positive bullet (explicit secret, no fallback) and a negative bullet (whoever changes the caller changes the folder and `prune`) were added. |
| 7 | Affected Artifacts are listed as links, and each is also in CrossReference | Pass | MIL-008 and ADR-0004 are linked and cited. |
| 8 | Status changes are recorded as new Version History rows with a Change summary and Commit link; retained rows are never rewritten | Pass | The findings fix is a new row; the first row is kept unchanged. |
| 9 | A superseded or deprecated ADR names its successor, and the successor links back | N-A | ADR-0004 is superseded only in part and stays in force until the scoped workflow is removed; see the action item. |
| 10 | Written in business or technical language of the domain, with no unexplained abbreviations | Pass | Finding fixed during this review: "PO language" is now "the product owner's language". |
| 11 | Status is one of `Proposed`, `Accepted`, `Rejected`, `Deprecated` or `Superseded by ADR-NNNN`, and every Version History row uses only these | Pass | `Proposed` only. |

## Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass; the three findings (criteria 5, 6 and 10) were fixed during the review. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-13; there is no independent reader.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| When the scoped workflow is removed, mark ADR-0004 superseded by ADR-0009 for the delivery and marker parts (new version row and review record) | S01 | the follow-up milestone |

---

---

[ADR-0009]: ../../adr/adr-0009-wiki-publishing-reusable-workflow.md
[QC-ADR-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-adr.md