# Review Record: UC-008 (Show Code Metrics and Coverage Badges)

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-069 |
| CrossReference | [UC-008], [QC-UC-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version; accepted | [9ca9673] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [UC-008]
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001]
- Scope: full review (Brief format; MIL-010 task 1)
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the user accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-14)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | Pass | One paragraph: push, count, read the report, publish three badges, README shows them. |
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Format is Brief. |
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | N-A | Format is Brief; actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions and the paragraph are present. |
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Both are stated; the postcondition says that only the badges change. |
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Software Engineer. |
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S02 and S05 with an interest each. |
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | N-A | Format is Brief. |
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | N-A | None in a Brief. |
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | N-A | No steps in a Brief. |
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor equal UCD-001 (RC-071); the Stories line lists US-001.18 to US-001.20, which exist (RC-070). |
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | Scope Reusable Workflow Collection, user-goal level. |
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Goal wording; no tool, file name or format of a report is named. |

## Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass. The AI records the decision as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | - | - |

---

[UC-008]: ../../uc-008/uc.md
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-use-case.md
[9ca9673]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/9ca9673b00351cf913966f347c4da09890ed3f1f