# Review Record: PP-001 Project Plan ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-002 | | CrossReference | [PP-001], [BC-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-10 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | [c017c06] | | 2026-10-10 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | S01 stood in for S05
Independence of the review is still open | pending | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [PP-001] - Checklist used: none: the Project Plan has no QC checklist (catalog and `PP.md` reference). Validated against the Business Case [BC-001] constraints and the Go / No-Go criteria of each listed milestone, as `PP.md` prescribes. ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Every milestone in the plan has a `MIL-*` document and the plan's dates equal that document's target date | Pass | MIL-001 to MIL-004 exist; decision dates 2026-10-17, 10-31, 11-14, 11-28 match the Target Date of each milestone. | | 2 | Every Business Case scope item is covered by a gateway | Pass | Scope Coverage maps validation, documentation, quality checks and release to MIL-001 to MIL-004. | | 3 | The schedule respects the Business Case constraints | Pass | The Business Case sets no deadline; the plan states its dates are proposals. The constraint that nothing is written before a milestone is accepted is repeated in Planning Assumptions. | | 4 | Dependencies between milestones are stated | Pass | Dependencies section gives MIL-001 to MIL-002 to MIL-003 to MIL-004. | | 5 | Every gateway has an owner who is a stakeholder ID | Pass | All four gateways are owned by S05. | | 6 | Plan content is consistent with the revised mirror behaviour | Pass | UC candidate 1 now describes no GitHub mirror as a successful skip and several mirrors as a failure. | | 7 | Open Issues are current | Fail | Open Issues still lists the decisions for MIL-001 task 1 and task 3 as open; both were decided and recorded in MIL-001. | ## Overall Verdict Go — S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10 for the revision to UC candidate 1. One stale entry in Open Issues does not affect the schedule or the changed use case; it is recorded as an action item. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); the S05 stand-in review is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too; independence is still open. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | Remove the answered MIL-001 task 1 and task 3 items from Open Issues in PP-001, with a Version History row | S01 | 2026-10-17 | | Confirm the proposed dates and the start week (already listed in Open Issues) | S01 | 2026-10-17 | --- [PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md [BC-001]: ../../business-case.md [c017c06]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/c017c06789424305b31f19e48238ad14231e8113