Add milestone MIL-005 with seven tasks, schedule it in PP-001, add the wiki
to the Business Case scope and record the wiki languages in the registry.
The milestone is Proposed; no wiki work starts before it is accepted.
Not every Gitea repository has a GitHub push mirror. Zero GitHub mirrors
now ends the run successfully without reading the GitHub secret; several
mirrors still fail. Tests, guides, README, BC-001, PP-001 and MIL-001
are updated to match.
Task: MIL-001#1
Task: MIL-001#5
Sync workflow: every failure is now reported as `ERROR: [category] message`
with the categories configuration, credentials (HTTP 401), permissions
(HTTP 403) and api (other HTTP errors, unreachable service); HTTP 404 is a
configuration error. Before changing anything the workflow checks that the
GitHub token can administer the mirror repository and stops with a
permissions error otherwise. No secret value is printed.
Guides: onboarding (with runner labels, prerequisites and offline runner
symptoms), credentials (minimum permissions, preflight, rotation) and
troubleshooting (every message mapped to a category and a fix). README
capability table updated. MIL-002 records the verification of scoped
workflow support: Gitea 1.27.3 runs the workflow in this repository;
delivery to other repositories is not yet verified.
Task: MIL-002#2
Task: MIL-002#3
Task: MIL-002#4
Task: MIL-002#5
Task: MIL-002#6
Task: MIL-002#7
Refs #9
Refs #10
Refs #11
Refs #12
Refs #13
Refs #14
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Set the owner/reviewer revision of each milestone to Accepted and deprecate
its initial row, as the Product Owner accepted the milestones. No task
content changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Restructure the script embedded in the scoped sync workflow into testable
functions, fix the invalid `exit 0` (now a successful run with a visible
warning when Gitea returns an invalid push mirror list) and report errors as
`ERROR: <message>` with exit code 1. Zero, several or malformed GitHub mirrors
still fail.
Add pytest-based offline tests (workflow YAML, embedded Python, credential and
mirror parsing, sync flow against a fake API) that run in a virtual
environment, and a validation workflow that runs them on pull requests and
pushes to main. Remove the manual tests/test_.ps1 probe and the duplicate
src/ copy of the workflow. Update the README and record the decisions for
tasks 1 and 3 in MIL-001.
Task: MIL-001#1
Task: MIL-001#2
Task: MIL-001#3
Task: MIL-001#4
Task: MIL-001#5
Task: MIL-001#6
Refs #1
Refs #2
Refs #3
Refs #4
Refs #5
Refs #6
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adopt the SQA/QC framework as a submodule and plan the project before any
further code: Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis (S01-S05), Project Plan with
use case candidates and prioritisation, and milestones MIL-001..MIL-004
(24 tasks, synced to Gitea as milestones 18-21 and issues #1-#24).
README now separates implemented from planned capabilities, has an English
sequence diagram and points at the scoped workflow. The workflow file moves
out of the repository root and out of .gitea/workflows/; the scoped copy is
unchanged in behaviour here and still contains the known `exit 0` syntax
error, which MIL-001 fixes.
Refs #1
Refs #2
Refs #3
Refs #6
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tirsvad
