Add review records RC-001 to RC-003 for BC-001, PP-001 and MIL-001

2026-10-10 08:00:50 +08:00
parent ec0f6e2cf8
commit c017c06789
4 changed files with 140 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Review Record: BC-001 Business Case
+
+## Metadata
+| Key | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| ID | RC-001 |
+| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001] |
+
+## Version History
+| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 2026-10-10 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S05 | Initial version | pending |
+
+---
+
+## Artifact Under Review
+
+- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
+- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] (`QC-BC-001`)
+
+## Checklist Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | The Cost–Benefit Assessment states costs as qualitative with no external cost and lists benefits; the qualitative form is labelled. |
+| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Risks table has Risk, Impact and Mitigation for every row. |
+| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Four criteria, each with a target and a measure. |
+| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | Scope has separate In Scope and Out of Scope lists. |
+| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table uses S01 to S05; the ID, not a role description, identifies each. |
+| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation cites the framework, Larman and ISO/IEC 25010:2023. |
+| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Separate Assumptions and Constraints sections. The 2026-10-10 change edits the mirror assumption only. |
+| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation section: Proceed, with the reason. |
+
+## Overall Verdict
+
+Go — all eight criteria pass. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10 for the revision that changes the mirror assumption to at most one GitHub push mirror. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); an independent review by S05 is recorded as an action item.
+
+## Action Items
+
+| Action | Owner | Due |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Independent review of this record and of BC-001 by a person other than the author (the rule that the reviewer must not be the author) | S05 | 2026-10-17 |
+
+---
+
+[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
+[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-business-case.md